A Practical Guide to Avoiding Biased Communication in Reproductive Biology.

When cultural biases pervade communication, whether visual or text-based, objectivity is impaired. Anthropocentrism (human-centered bias) and androcentrism (male-centered bias) in particular distort perspectives in mammalian reproductive biology. This paper provides a resource for professionals who understand how cultural biases can be reinforced with language, visuals, and conceptual framing.

The Female Snark Is Still a Boojum: Looking toward the Future of Studying Female Reproductive Biology.

Philosophical truths are hidden in Lewis Carroll's nonsense poems, such as "The hunting of the snark." When the poem is used as a scientific allegory, a snark stands for the pursuit of scientific truth, while a boojum is a spurious discovery. In the study of female biology, boojums have been the result of the use of cultural stereotypes to frame hypotheses and methodologies.

It Takes Two to Tango: Including a Female Perspective in Reproductive Biology.

Like many scientific disciplines, the field of reproductive biology is subject to biases in terminology and research foci. For example, females are often described as coy and passive players in reproductive behaviors and are termed "promiscuous" if they engage in extra-pair copulations. Males on the other hand are viewed as actively holding territories and fighting with other males.

Misconceptions about Conception and Other Fallacies: Historical Bias in Reproductive Biology.

Natural selection (differential reproduction) is a major tenet of evolutionary theory. In mammals the success of reproduction is primarily controlled by females who provide the majority of offspring care via gestation and lactation. In some species, maternal care also extends post-weaning.