Publications by authors named "V Ficarra"

Background: Voluntary PCa screening frequently results in excessive use of unnecessary diagnostic tests and an increasing risk of detection of indolent PCa and unaffordable costs for the various national health systems. In this scenario, the Italian Society of Urology (Società Italiana di Urologia, SIU) proposes an organized flow chart guiding physicians to improve early diagnosis of significant PCa avoiding unnecessary diagnostic tests and prostate biopsy.

Methods: According to available evidence and international guidelines [i.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

To contrast opportunistic PCa screening, the European Union Council suggested extending screening programs to PCa by recommending the implementation of a stepwise approach in the EU Countries to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of an organized program based on PSA testing in combination with additional MRI as a follow-up test. The objective of this expert-based document is to propose an organized PCa screening program according to the EU Council recommendations. The Italian Society of Urology (SIU) developed a team of experts with the aim to report 1) the most recent epidemiologic data about incidence, prevalence, and mortality of PCa; 2) the most important risk factors to identify categories of men with an increased risk to eventually develop the disease; 3) the most relevant studies presenting data on population-based screening; and 4) the current recommendations of the leading International Guidelines.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Prostate cancer is the second most common cancer in males worldwide, and its incidence is rising. Early detection is crucial for improving the outcomes, but the current screening methods have limitations. While prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing is the most widely used screening tool, it has poor specificity, leading to a high rate of false positives and unnecessary biopsies.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The systematic review evaluated the status of new robotic systems approved for urological surgery, focusing on their evolution based on the IDEAL framework.
  • It found 74 studies, with 90.5% being noncomparative, while only one randomized trial compared the KangDuo system with the da Vinci system.
  • Results showed that the new robotic platforms had similar outcomes to the da Vinci system, but the review highlighted limitations like small sample sizes and the lack of robust comparative studies.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF