Role of Left-Hand Cut Contributions on Pole Extractions from Lattice Data: Case Study for T_{cc}(3875)^{+}.

We discuss recent lattice data for the T_{cc}(3875)^{+} state to stress, for the first time, a potentially strong impact of left-hand cuts from the one-pion exchange on the pole extraction for near-threshold exotic states. In particular, if the left-hand cut is located close to the two-particle threshold, which happens naturally in the DD^{*} system for the pion mass exceeding its physical value, the effective-range expansion is valid only in a very limited energy range up to the cut and as such is of little use to reliably extract the poles. Then, an accurate extraction of the pole locations requires the one-pion exchange to be implemented explicitly into the scattering amplitudes.

Developing antisense oligonucleotides for a mutation-induced, ultra-rare neurological disorder using patient-derived cellular models.

Mutations in the gene are the cause of an ultra-rare neurological disorder characterized by intellectual disability, impaired speech, motor delay, and hypotonia evolving to spasticity, central sleep apnea, and premature death (SPG49 or HSAN9; OMIM: 615031). Little is known about the biological function of TECPR2, and there are currently no available disease-modifying therapies for this disease. Here we describe implementation of an antisense oligonucleotide (ASO) exon-skipping strategy targeting c.

Is the existence of a J/ψJ/ψ bound state plausible?

In a recent measurement LHCb reported pronounced structures in the J/ψJ/ψ spectrum. One of the various possible explanations of those is that they emerge from non-perturbative interactions of vector charmonia. It is thus important to understand whether it is possible to form a bound state of two charmonia interacting through the exchange of gluons, which hadronise into two pions at the longest distance.

Erratum: Coupled-Channel Interpretation of the LHCb Double-J/ψ Spectrum and Hints of a New State Near the J/ψJ/ψ Threshold [Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 132001 (2021)].

This corrects the article DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.