Perioperative prophylaxis with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in high-risk colorectal cancer patients for an improved recovery: A randomized, controlled trial.

Background: We aimed to improve the postoperative outcome of high-risk patients (American Society of Anesthesiologists class 3 and 4) recovering from colorectal cancer surgery by using recombinant human G-CSF (filgrastim) as perioperative prophylaxis.

Methods: In a double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial, 80 patients undergoing left-sided colorectal resection were randomized to filgrastim or placebo. Filgrastim (5 mug/kg) or placebo was administered in the afternoon on day -1, 0, and +1 relative to the operation.

Dependence of positive effects of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on the antibiotic regimen: evaluation in rats with polymicrobial peritonitis.

We tested the hypothesis that the ability of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) to prevent death from fecal peritonitis is influenced by the composition of the antibiotic regimen with which it is administered. We used a rodent model of polymicrobial peritoneal contamination and infection and the concept of clinical modeling randomized trials (CMRTs), which includes the conditions of randomized, clinical trials and complex clinical interventions (e.g.

Effects of G-CSF and antibiotic prophylaxis in a 2 x 2 factorial design on outcome in septic rats.

Objective: In a recently completed randomised clinical trial in patients with colorectal cancer resections the combination of the granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) + cefuroxime/ metronidazole (cef/met) was superior to ofloxacin/metronidazole (ofl/met). These combinations were used to confirm the clinical data and to validate the concept of clinic modelling randomised trials (CMRTs) in a rat model of intra-abdominal sepsis.

Subjects: 80 male Wistar rats were randomised in a 2 x 2 factorial study design.

Checking for interviewer bias in outcome assessment: a method for strengthening the design of prospective, randomised trials in surgery.

Background: Blind, randomised trials are conceived as the gold standard in clinical research, but this ideal, in its strict sense, can rarely be achieved in surgical settings. One way to strengthen the study design is to check for observer bias in the assessment and evaluation of surgical outcome.

Method: In a randomised, prospective trial comparing nasogastric versus gastrostomy tubes the primary endpoint was the subjective inconvenience induced by the tube system and was assessed in the context of a standardised face-to-face interview.

The genetic background of hypertensive, septic rats determines outcome improvement with antibiotic and G-CSF prophylaxis.

Hypertension is proposed as a risk factor among others (high age, diabetes mellitus, and pre- and intraoperative bleeding) for adverse outcomes, such as severe infections, leading to sepsis and to multiple organ failure as the most deleterious complication. Hypertension was modeled with spontaneous hypertensive rats (SHR) and Dahl salt-sensitive (DS) rats and the infective complication by polymicrobial, peritoneal contamination, and infection (PCI). The concept of clinic modeling randomized trials was used to simulate clinical complexity, including a relevant antibiotic prophylaxis in combination with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) and clinical trial conditions.