Validating a novel paradigm for simultaneously assessing mismatch response and frequency-following response to speech sounds.

Background: Speech sounds are processed in the human brain through intricate and interconnected cortical and subcortical structures. Two neural signatures, one largely from cortical sources (mismatch response, MMR) and one largely from subcortical sources (frequency-following response, FFR) are critical for assessing speech processing as they both show sensitivity to high-level linguistic information. However, there are distinct prerequisites for recording MMR and FFR, making them difficult to acquire simultaneously NEW METHOD: Using a new paradigm, our study aims to concurrently capture both signals and test them against the following criteria: (1) replicating the effect that the MMR to a native speech contrast significantly differs from the MMR to a nonnative speech contrast, and (2) demonstrating that FFRs to three speech sounds can be reliably differentiated.

How Do You Feel the Rhythm: Dynamic Motor-Auditory Interactions Are Involved in the Imagination of Hierarchical Timing.

Predicting and organizing patterns of events is important for humans to survive in a dynamically changing world. The motor system has been proposed to be actively, and necessarily, engaged in not only the production but the perception of rhythm by organizing hierarchical timing that influences auditory responses. It is not yet well understood how the motor system interacts with the auditory system to perceive and maintain hierarchical structure in time.

The interplay of interval models and entrainment models in duration perception.

Despite extensive research demonstrating the effect of temporal context on time perception, its underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood. One influential proposal to explain the temporal context effect is McAuley and Jones' (2003) framework that incorporates 2 classic timing models, interval and entrainment models. They demonstrated that listeners' duration estimates were shifted from reality in opposite directions when to-be-judged durations occurred earlier versus later than an expected beat, which is predicted by their entrainment models.