Selection shapes the robustness of ligand-binding amino acids.

The phenotypes of biological systems are to some extent robust to genotypic changes. Such robustness exists on multiple levels of biological organization. We analyzed this robustness for two categories of amino acids in proteins.

Design constraints on a synthetic metabolism.

A metabolism is a complex network of chemical reactions that converts sources of energy and chemical elements into biomass and other molecules. To design a metabolism from scratch and to implement it in a synthetic genome is almost within technological reach. Ideally, a synthetic metabolism should be able to synthesize a desired spectrum of molecules at a high rate, from multiple different nutrients, while using few chemical reactions, and producing little or no waste.

Certain non-standard coding tables appear to be more robust to error than the standard genetic code.

Since the identification of the Standard Coding Table as a "universal" method to translate genetic information into amino acids, exceptions to this rule have been reported, and to date there are nearly 20 alternative genetic coding tables deployed by either nuclear genomes or organelles of organisms. Why are these codes still in use and why are new codon reassignments occurring? This present study aims to provide a new method to address these questions and to analyze whether these alternative codes present any advantages or disadvantages to the organisms or organelles in terms of robustness to error. We show that two of the alternative coding tables, The Ciliate, Dasycladacean and Hexamita Nuclear Code (CDH) and The Flatworm Mitochondrial Code (FMC), exhibit an advantage, while others such as The Yeast Mitochondrial Code (YMC) are at a significant disadvantage.