Publications by authors named "Tripac Irina"

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) of the gynecological tract are a rare, heterogenous and aggressive group of neoplasms, with high recurrence rates and poor prognosis. In this review we focus on NENs of the gynecological system emphasizing the classification, epidemiological and clinical characteristics of NENs across the gynecological tract (cervix, endometrium, ovary, vagina, and vulva), risk/prognostic factors, pathology and molecular biology (including actionable genomic mutations), imaging, staging and the most effective treatment modalities in the "standard of care" approach as well as the pipeline products. We also focused on metastatic spreading patterns of gynecological NENs.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Cervical cancer (CC) is linked to a poor prognosis and significant socioeconomic challenges, with incidence rates varying across Europe due to factors like screening practices and human development index (HDI).
  • This study systematically reviewed existing literature on cost-effectiveness of CC screening in Europe, focusing on research from the last 25 years and following PRISMA guidelines for quality assessment.
  • Out of 262 studies, 22 were analyzed, revealing that most new screening strategies, particularly those using primary HPV testing, were more cost-effective compared to existing methods, with various options meeting cost-effectiveness criteria.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Clinical trials that investigate therapies for rare gynaecological cancers (RGC) are essential to provide evidence-based data towards new effective and safe treatments, however, they present unique challenges. The main objective of this narrative review is to summarize completed phase III clinical trials investigating therapies for RGC and to discuss the outcomes of these trials. PRISMA guidelines were used to report the steps of the review.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynecological cancer in developed countries. In literature, there are discordant data regarding the therapeutic value of systematic lymphadenectomy whereas the importance of lymph node status for determining prognosis and the need for adjuvant treatment is undoubted. Given the low risk of lymph node metastases in stage I-II of EC and the significant surgical and postoperative risks when performing a complete pelvic lymphadenectomy, the surgical approach in these patients is controversial, ranging from no nodal evaluation to comprehensive pelvic and aortic lymphadenectomy.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF