Aberrant glycosylation is a universal feature of cancer cells, and certain glycan structures are well-known markers for tumor progression. Availability and composition of sugars in the microenvironment may affect cell glycosylation. Recent studies of human breast tumor cell lines indicate their ability to take up and utilize fructose.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFObesity increases mammary tumor development in Zucker rats following a single administration of the procarcinogen 7,12-dimenthylbenz(a)anthracene (DMBA). Fifty-day-old obese and lean female Zucker rats were orally gavaged with 65 mg/kg DMBA and sacrificed 139 days post DMBA treatment. At the end of the experiment, mammary tumors were detected in 68% of the obese rats compared to 32% of the lean group (P<0.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnd-products of glycolysis as well as phospholipid precursors and catabolites have been suggested as metabolic indicators of tumor progression. To test the hypothesis that increased levels of such indicators can distinguish metastatic phenotypes, we determined a limited cellular 1H-NMR metabolic profile of subpopulations of murine mammary 4T1 cells that differ in their metastatic potential. Subpopulations with differing metastatic phenotypes were identified by sorting for the expression of the cell surface adhesion oligosaccharide sialylated Lewis x (sLeX).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFExpression of sialyl Lewis(x) (sLe(x)) and sLe(a) on tumor cells is thought to facilitate metastasis by promoting cell adhesion to selectins on vascular endothelial cells. Experiments supporting this concept usually bypass the early steps of the metastatic process by employing tumor cells that are injected directly into the blood. We investigated the relative role of sLe(x) oligosaccharide in the dissemination of breast carcinoma, employing a spontaneous murine metastasis model.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFThe mechanism by which peptides bind to micelles is believed to be a two-phase process, involving (i). initial electrostatic interactions between the peptide and micelle surface, followed by (ii). hydrophobic interactions between peptide side chains and the micelle core.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF