Purpose This study aimed to measure masseter muscle activity throughout the day in outpatients suspected of having awake bruxism (AB) and/or sleep bruxism (SB) and examine the relationship between AB and SB by comparing muscle activity during daytime wakefulness and nighttime sleep.Methods Fifty outpatients with suspected SB and/or AB participated in this study. A single-channel wearable electromyogram (EMG) device was used for EMG recording.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPurpose: We aimed to clarify the relationship between the number of sleep bruxism (SB) bursts at home and in a laboratory equipped with polysomnography with audio-video recording (PSG-AV). We applied an identical single-channel wearable electromyography (EMG) device for both types of SB burst scorings.
Methods: The subjects were 20 healthy student volunteers (12 men and 8 women; mean age, 21.
: Assessments of diurnal awake bruxism (d-AB) using masseteric electromyogram (EMG) during various lengths of measurement time within a day were examined as the first step of research to clarify the minimum measurement time required for assessment of d-AB by subject.: Subjects were 33 outpatients. Assessment of d-AB by EMG during partial measurement time (PMT) with durations ranging from 30 minutes to 6 hours was compared with that during total measurement time (TMT) used as the reference standard.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFRhythmic masticatory muscle activity (RMMA), which is defined as three or more consecutive phasic bursts, accounts for a large part of sleep bruxism (SB). RMMA is thought to be characterized by co-contraction, a jaw muscle activity in which jaw-opening muscles contract during the active phase of jaw-closing muscles, which is different from that during mastication. However, there has been limited information about co-contraction.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPurpose: The purpose of this study was to clarify the validity of assessment of sleep bruxism (SB) by using single-channel electromyogram (EMG) and a cut-off value with optimum sensitivity and specificity.
Methods: The subjects were twenty volunteers with clinical diagnosis of SB. Assessment by masseteric EMG data only by using a wearable EMG was compared with reference standard assessment by masseteric EMG data using polysomnography with audio-visual recording (PSG-AV).