Publications by authors named "Tony Weir"

Introduction: Extraction of a single mandibular incisor may be prescribed in conjunction with clear aligner orthodontic treatment. The accuracy of therapeutic mesiodistal tooth positioning for the remaining mandibular anterior teeth for such patients has not been comprehensively evaluated. This retrospective study compared the predicted and achieved mesiodistal tooth movements in the mandibular anterior region for patients treated with Invisalign (Align Technology, Santa Clara, Calif), along with the influence of aligner attachments and the frequency of aligner change.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: To determine whether the achieved mandibular central incisor lingual root torque (LRT) changes matched the planned changes after treatment with an initial series of Invisalign aligners when ≥10° of torque change was planned.

Materials And Methods: A sample of adult patients who underwent treatment with the Invisalign appliance between 2013 and 2021 were evaluated. The pretreatment, planned, and achieved posttreatment digital models were measured using Geomagic Control X metrology software.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Intro: The aim of the current study was to develop and describe a new measuring system for the orientation of a tooth in a digitalized cast of a jaw and provide new angular values for the rotation, torque and tip of maxillary and mandibular teeth.

Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study involved the utilization of a sub-group of extrinsic Euler-angles to derive optimal norm values per tooth in three different planes of orientation ('rotation', 'torque' and 'tip') by evaluating the digital representations of the teeth derived from a database containing over 17,500 patients. The process involved the entry of the .

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Data regarding the efficacy of deep overbite correction with clear aligner therapy in adolescent patients are lacking. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of deep overbite reduction in adolescent patients treated with Invisalign (Align Technology, San Jose, Calif) aligners.

Methods: This retrospective study investigated a sample of 102 patients aged 10-17 years from a large database.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: This study aimed to investigate the expression of root angulation in canine, premolar, and first molar teeth adjacent to first and second premolar extraction sites in the maxilla after treatment with an initial series of Invisalign aligners (Align Technology, Santa Clara, Calif).

Methods: Adult patients (aged ≥18 years) with at least 1 first and/or second premolar extraction in the maxilla and satisfying strict selection criteria were evaluated. Digital models representing pretreatment, predicted, and posttreatment were obtained from Align Technology's digital interface, ClinCheck.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: This study aimed to investigate whether there was a difference between the planned and achieved lingual root torque of the maxillary central incisors in patients treated with an initial series of Invisalign (Align Technology, Santa Clara, Calif) aligners in which >10° change in the inclination of these teeth was prescribed via the ClinCheck facility.

Methods: The pretreatment, planned, and the digital models after wear of the initial series of aligners regarding adult patients who satisfied selection criteria and were treated using the Invisalign appliance were measured using the Geomagic Control X software (version 2017.0.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Research regarding orthodontic changes using the superimposition of digital study models (DSMs) is commonplace. Information regarding the accuracy of data processing by superimposition software is limited. The study aimed to compare different methods of superimposing DSMs using implant-supported crowns (ISC) as a stable reference structure.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: The primary aim of the investigation was to survey clear aligner therapy (CAT) use among general dentists in Australia. A secondary aim was to evaluate the factors that influenced general dentists in Australia not to provide CAT.

Material And Methods: General dentists registered with the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency were invited to participate in a structured cross-sectional electronic survey.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • A study was done to see how orthodontists in Canada feel about clear aligner therapy (CAT) because they are using it more often, but there's no clear agreement on how to use it best.
  • The survey had 60 orthodontists answer questions about their use of CAT, focusing on how many cases they treat with it and why they choose to use it.
  • Results showed that many orthodontists use CAT mainly for adult patients, and factors like the complexity of dental issues and patient cooperation affect their decisions; some also use it with other types of braces.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Expeditious strides in the fields of biomaterials, computer-aided design, and manufacturing have catapulted clear aligner therapy (CAT) to become a comprehensive orthodontic treatment modality. The efficiency of achieving planned tooth movement with clear aligners is a significant consideration while setting up the final treatment goals, as well as calculating treatment times and costs based on the available evidence. Contemporary research outcomes confirm that one of the most commonly reported clinical concerns with CAT is the discrepancy between the prescribed outcome in the digital treatment plan and the clinically achieved outcome from a given series of aligners.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: The aim of the present study was to compare the changes in overjet and overbite measurements achieved in adolescent patients following an initial series of Invisalign® aligners (Align Technology, San Jose, California) with those planned by orthodontists via its ClinCheck® digital treatment planning facility.

Methods: Data provided by Align regarding patients who had completed an initial series of Invisalign® aligner treatment and were less than 18-years old were assessed in relation to pre-treatment, planned and achieved overjet and overbite measurements. Descriptive statistics, Wilcoxon rank-sum, Mann Whitney calculations were computed.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: To survey treatment-planning practices of orthodontists related to the Invisalign Lite clear aligner appliance (Align Technology, San Jose, Calif).

Materials And Methods: Patients satisfying inclusion and exclusion criteria and treated with Invisalign Lite were selected from a database containing more than 17,000 patients. Relevant data regarding treatment-planning practices were obtained from Align Technology's treatment-planning facility, ClinCheck, and evaluated.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: : This retrospective cohort study aimed to assess and compare the accuracy of 3 different Invisalign treatment regimens in terms of variations of aligner change frequency and type of aligner material in achieving maxillary dental buccal expansion.

Methods: : Altogether, 120 adult patients whose treatment involved maxillary dental expansion with Invisalign were included. The patients were divided into 3 groups, with each group comprising 40 patients as follows: SmartTrack 1-week changes (ST1), SmartTrack 2-week changes (ST2), and EX30 2-week changes (EX2).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Interproximal reduction (IPR) is a common adjunct to contemporary orthodontic treatment. This study aimed to carry out a quantitative analysis of IPR prescribed in the refinement phases of clear aligner therapy with the Invisalign appliance (Align Technology, San Jose, Calif).

Methods: The digital treatment plans (DTPs) of a total of 330 patients treated by 11 orthodontists were evaluated.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: This retrospective investigation aimed to determine whether the achieved changes in the treatment of Class II malocclusion were the same as those planned after the prescribed wear of an initial phase of Invisalign treatment with the mandibular advancement appliance (MAA) (Align Technology, Santa Jose, Calif).

Methods: All patients treated with the MAA and who satisfied inclusion/exclusion criteria were selected from a database of 16,500 patients treated with clear aligners by 16 orthodontists. The pretreatment, planned, and achieved overjet measurements were documented from data provided in Align Technology's software facility, ClinCheck.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: To investigate the accuracy of the Invisalign appliance in achieving predicted angular tooth movement of the maxillary central incisors, to locate the center of rotation in a labio-palatal direction, and to investigate any difference between 1-weekly and 2-weekly wear protocols.

Materials And Methods: This study involved a retrospective sample of two groups of 46 Class I adult subjects treated non-extraction with different protocols of 1-weekly and 2-weekly wear. The pretreatment, predicted outcome and achieved outcome digital models were superimposed and measured using metrology software.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: To determine whether achieved outcome regarding overjet and overbite matched the predicted outcome following treatment with Invisalign (Align Technology, San Jose, Calif) aligner appliances.

Materials And Methods: Data including pretreatment, predicted and achieved overjet, and overbite measurements provided by Align's digital treatment facility, ClinCheck Pro, were evaluated. Descriptive statistics, Mann-Whitney U-test, and Wilcoxon rank-sum intraclass correlation (ICC) test results were calculated.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: To investigate clear aligner therapy (CAT) practice among orthodontists in the British Orthodontic Society (BOS).

Design: A cross-sectional online survey.

Methods: An electronic survey was distributed to members of the BOS in 2022.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: To investigate whether the predicted changes in overbite (OB) and overjet (OJ) in Align Technology's (Santa Jose, Calif) digital treatment plan for the prescribed course of treatment with the Invisalign appliance were consistent with those same changes in OB and OJ measured with the Geomagic Control X (Geomagic US, Research, Triangle Park, NC) metrology software system.

Materials And Methods: Geomagic Control X software was used to determine OB and OJ differences between the pretreatment and predicted outcome. STL files for patients satisfying inclusion criteria and undergoing nonextraction orthodontic treatment with the Invisalign appliance.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: This retrospective study aims to evaluate the predictability of the Invisalign appliance (Align Technology, Santa Clara, CA) in leveling the maxillary curve of Wilson (COW).

Methods: 53 adult subjects treated by orthodontists who are experienced Invisalign providers, between 2013 and 2019 were selected. All patients had either Angle Class I or II malocclusions and were treated by non-extraction in the maxillary arch with a minimum of 14 Invisalign aligners with no bite ramps or auxiliaries.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Anterior open bite correction with Invisalign has been claimed to have relatively good predictability because of the proposed function of clear aligners to function as occlusal bite-blocks, limiting extrusion of the posterior teeth or possibly even intruding posterior teeth. This proposal, however, remains relatively unsubstantiated. The objective of this study was to investigate and determine the accuracy of Invisalign treatment in correcting anterior open bite by comparing the predicted outcome from ClinCheck to the achieved outcome for the initial aligner sequence.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: To evaluate the predictability of the Invisalign appliance (Align Technology, Santa Clara, Calif) in leveling the maxillary curve of Spee (COS).

Materials And Methods: A retrospective sample of adult subjects treated with the Invisalign appliance between 2013 and 2019 were selected. Patients were treated nonextraction in the maxillary arch and had either Angle Class I or II malocclusions with a minimum of 14 aligners with no bite ramps.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: To investigate the changes made by orthodontists to the initial digital treatment plan (DTP) regarding the Invisalign appliance provided by Align Technology until acceptance of the plan by the orthodontist.

Materials And Methods: The DTPs of subjects who underwent treatment with the Invisalign appliance and satisfied inclusion criteria were assessed to determine the number of DTPs and changes regarding prescription of aligners, composite resin (CR) attachments, and interproximal reduction (IPR) between the initial DTP and the accepted plan. Statistical analyses were calculated via GraphPad Prism 9.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: To investigate the total number of digital treatment plan (DTPs) and aligners manufactured for clear aligner therapy (CAT) by Invisalign from initial treatment planning to the completion of CAT.

Design: A retrospective cohort study.

Material And Methods: A total of 30 patients, from each of 11 experienced orthodontists, who commenced treatment over a 12-month period, were assessed regarding the number of DTPs and aligners prescribed from initial planning to completion of CAT.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF