The role of cognitive biases and personality variables in subclinical delusional ideation.

Introduction: A number of cognitive biases, most notably a data gathering bias characterised by "jumping to conclusions" (JTC), and the "bias against disconfirmatory evidence" (BADE), have been shown to be associated with delusions and subclinical delusional ideation. Certain personality variables, particularly "openness to experience", are thought to be associated with schizotypy.

Methods: Using structural equation modelling, we examined the association between two higher order subfactors ("aspects") of "openness to experience" (labelled "openness" and "intellect"), these cognitive biases, and their relationship to subclinical delusional ideation in 121 healthy, nonpsychiatric controls.

Cognitive factors associated with subclinical delusional ideation in the general population.

Cognitive biases have been found to be associated with delusions in schizophrenia and schizotypy. In the current study, we examined the relationship between subclinical delusional ideation, measured using the Peters Delusions Inventory, and cognitive biases including the bias against disconfirmatory evidence (BADE), 'jumping to conclusions', and need for closure, evaluated using the computerized BADE program, in a sample of 117 healthy, non-psychiatric controls. Our results suggest that subclinical delusional ideation is associated with BADE, greater need for closure, a 'jumping to conclusions' response style, and a tendency to rate absurd and unlikely interpretations of an event as more plausible, which might be indicative of insufficient evidence integration or 'liberal acceptance'.