Comparison of pressure measurement, dobutamine contrast stress echocardiography and SPECT for the evaluation of intermediate coronary stenoses. The COMPRESS trial.

Background: DSE and SPECT are two well-established methods to non-invasively investigate the functional significance of coronary artery stenoses in patients with coronary artery disease. The measurement of Fractional Flow Reserve has emerged a new invasive reference standard for lesion specific quantification of coronary artery stenoses. The objective of our prospective study was to compare sensitivity and specificity of Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography (DSE) and Single Photon Emission Computer tomography (SPECT) with the pressure derived Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) for the identification of hemodynamic relevant coronary lesions in patients with predominately coronary multivessel disease and angiographically intermediate stenoses.

Fractional flow reserve predicts major adverse cardiac events after coronary stent implantation.

Objectives: Determination of fractional flow reserve (FFR) allows the functional assessment of coronary stenoses before and after an intervention. Preliminary data suggest that a FFR > or = 0.94 is associated with an excellent clinical outcome after stent implantation.

Safety of FFR-based treatment strategies: the Munich experience.

Fractional flow reserve (FFR) as a new technique for physiological assessment of coronary stenoses could identify patients with CAD in whom the deferral of an intended PCI was more beneficial than performing the planned procedure. It is up to now unknown whether a FFR-based therapy stratification is also safe in patients with multivessel disease and complex coronary lesions. This study demonstrates in 71 symptomatic patients with predominantly multivessel disease and angiographically intermediate coronary lesions that patients do not benefit from PCI procedures in terms of overall survival, target vessel patency or clinical symptoms during 12 month follow-up if FFR is above 0.