Publications by authors named "Thusitha Mabotuwana"

Radiology reports often contain follow-up imaging recommendations, but failure to comply with them in a timely manner can lead to delayed treatment, poor patient outcomes, complications, and legal liability. Using a dataset containing 2,972,164 exams for over 7 years, in this study we explored the association between recommendation specificity on follow-up rates. Our results suggest that explicitly mentioning the follow-up interval as part of a follow-up imaging recommendation has a significant impact on adherence making these recommendations 3 times more likely (95% CI: 2.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Critical results reporting guidelines demand that certain critical findings are communicated to the responsible provider within a specific period of time. In this paper, we discuss a generic report processing pipeline to extract critical findings within the dictated report to allow for automation of quality and compliance oversight using a production dataset containing 1,210,858 radiology exams. Algorithm accuracy on an annotated dataset having 327 sentences was 91.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Radiology reports often contain follow-up imaging recommendations. Failure to comply with these recommendations in a timely manner can lead to delayed treatment, poor patient outcomes, complications, unnecessary testing, lost revenue, and legal liability. The objective of this study was to develop a scalable approach to automatically identify the completion of a follow-up imaging study recommended by a radiologist in a preceding report.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Radiology reports often contain follow-up imaging recommendations. Failure to comply with these recommendations in a timely manner can lead to poor patient outcomes, complications, and legal liability. As such, the primary objective of this research was to determine adherence rates to follow-up recommendations.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Image interpretation accuracy is critical to ensure optimal care, yet many diagnostic reports contain expressions of uncertainty often due to shortcomings in technical quality among other factors. While radiologists will usually attempt to interpret images and render a diagnosis even if the imaging quality is suboptimal, often the details related to any quality concerns are dictated into the report. Despite imaging exam quality being an import factor for accurate image interpretation, there is a significant knowledge gap in terms of understanding the nature and frequency of technical limitations mentioned in radiology reports.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

In this paper, we model the statistical properties of imaging exam durations using parametric probability distributions such as the Gaussian, Gamma, Weibull, lognormal, and log-logistic. We establish that in a majority of radiology procedures, the underlying distribution of exam durations is best modeled by a log-logistic distribution, while the Gaussian has the poorest fit among the candidates. Further, through illustrative examples, we show how business insights and workflow analytics can be significantly impacted by making the correct (log-logistic) versus incorrect (Gaussian) model choices.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Failure of timely follow-up imaging recommendations can result in suboptimal patient care. Evidence suggests that the use of conditional language in follow-up recommendations is associated with changes to follow-up compliance. Assuming that referring physicians prefer explicit guidance for follow-up recommendations, we develop algorithms to extract recommended modality and interval from follow-up imaging recommendations related to lung, thyroid and adrenal findings.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: Radiology reports often contain follow-up imaging recommendations. However, these recommendations are not always followed up by referring physicians and patients. Failure to comply in a timely manner can lead to delayed treatment, poor patient outcomes, unnecessary testing, lost revenue, and legal liability.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Adherence rates for timely imaging follow-up are usually low due to low rates of diligence by referring physicians and/or patients with following recommendations for follow-up imaging. This can lead to delayed treatment, poor patient outcomes, unnecessary testing, and legal liability. Existing follow-up recommendation detection methods are often disease- and modality-specific.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: Across the United States, there is a growing number of patients in Accountable Care Organizations and under risk contracts with commercial insurance. This is due to proliferation of new value-based payment models and care delivery reform efforts. In this context, the business model of radiology within a hospital or health system context is shifting from a primary profit-center to a cost-center with a goal of cost savings.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

With ongoing healthcare payment reforms in the USA, radiology is moving from its current state of a revenue generating department to a new reality of a cost-center. Under bundled payment methods, radiology does not get reimbursed for each and every inpatient procedure, but rather, the hospital gets reimbursed for the entire hospital stay under an applicable diagnosis-related group code. The hospital case mix index (CMI) metric, as defined by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, has a significant impact on how much hospitals get reimbursed for an inpatient stay.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

In the typical radiology reading workflow, a radiologist would go through an imaging study and annotate specific regions of interest. The radiologist has the option to select a suitable description (e.g.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Radiology reports frequently contain references to image slices that are illustrative of described findings, for instance, "Neurofibroma in superior right extraconal space (series 5, image 104)". In the current workflow, if a report consumer wants to view a referenced image, he or she needs to (1) open prior study, (2) open the series of interest (series 5 in this example), and (3) navigate to the corresponding image slice (image 104). This research aims to improve this report-to-image navigation process by providing hyperlinks to images.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The naming of imaging procedures is currently not standardized across institutions. As a result, it is a challenge to establish national registries, for instance, a national registry of dose to facilitate comparisons among different types of CT procedures. RSNA's RadLex Playbook is an effort towards addressing this gap (by introducing a unique Playbook identifier called an RPID for each procedure), and the current research focuses on semi-automatically mapping institution-specific procedure descriptions to Playbook entries to assist with this standardization effort.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The typical radiology reporting workflow involves the radiologist first looking at one or more relevant prior studies before interpreting the current study. To improve workflow efficiency, PACS systems can display relevant prior imaging studies, typically based on a study's anatomy as indicated in the Body Part Examined field of the DICOM header. The content of the Body Part Examined field can be very generic.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Determining similarity between two individual concepts or two sets of concepts extracted from a free text document is important for various aspects of biomedicine, for instance, to find prior clinical reports for a patient that are relevant to the current clinical context. Using simple concept matching techniques, such as lexicon based comparisons, is typically not sufficient to determine an accurate measure of similarity.

Methods: In this study, we tested an enhancement to the standard document vector cosine similarity model in which ontological parent-child (is-a) relationships are exploited.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: Analysis of practice electronic medical records (EMRs) demonstrated widespread antihypertensive medication adherence problems in a Pacific-led general practice serving a predominantly Pacific (majority Samoan) caseload in suburban New Zealand. Adherence was quantified in terms of medication possession ratio (MPR, percent of days covered by medication supply) from the practice's prescribing data. We studied the effectiveness of general practice staff follow-up guided by EMR data to improve medication adherence.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Adherence to antidepressant therapy remains a major issue worldwide. Most people with depression are treated in a general practice setting, but many stop taking antidepressants before completing a six-month course as recommended by guidelines.

Objectives: To determine antidepressant adherence rates as indicated in primary care prescribing data and pharmacy dispensing data; to demonstrate commonly occurring patterns related to non-adherence, using a prescription visualisation tool we have developed; and to determine whether prescribing data is a good predictor of dispensing based adherence.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Poor adherence to long-term prescription medication is a frequent problem that undermines pharmacological control of important risk factors such as hypertension. A medication possession ratio (MPR) can be calculated from Practice Management System (PMS) data to provide a convenient indicator of adherence. We investigate how well prior MPR predicts later MPR, taking MPR<80% as indicative of 'non-adherence,' to assess the potential value of MPR calculation on PMS data for targeting adherence promotion activities by general practices.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aim: To explore influences on adherence to taking long-term medications among Samoan patients in an Auckland general practice.

Methods: Twenty Samoan participants from an Auckland general practice were identified and interviewed about their views on adherence or non-adherence to taking blood pressure-lowering medications. One-to-one semi-structured interviews using open-ended questions were undertaken in Samoan and English, recorded, transcribed and translated into English.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Pay for performance incentives are becoming increasingly popular, but are typically based on only a single point-in-time measurement as an indicator of chronic condition management.

Aims: To determine the association between three time-interval based indicators of suboptimal blood pressure (BP) control and two point-in-time indicators from the UK Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF): BP5 (the percentage of patients with hypertension in whom the last BP in the previous nine months was < or = 150/90) and DM12 (the percentage of patients with diabetes in whom the last BP in the previous 15 months was < or = 145/85).

Methods: We extracted classification data and BP measurements from four New Zealand general practices with 4260 to 6130 enrolled patients.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Quality indicators are an important part of the primary care landscape, but focus strongly on point-in-time measurements, such as a patient's last blood pressure (BP) measurement. There is a larger space of possible measurements, including ones that more explicitly consider management over an interval of time.

Objective: To determine the predictive abilities of five different quality indicators related to poor BP control.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Poor adherence and persistence to long-term medication is a growing concern worldwide. Despite their importance, tools that facilitate the identification of patients who show poor adherence and persistence rates are limited. Herein we present a framework we have developed to assist in assessing adherence and persistence rates.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Management of patients with hypertension is poor and novel tools are needed to identify patients whose clinical outcomes can be improved. We herein present a framework we have developed that can be used to identify patients who meet specific audit criteria related to poor management of hypertension. Identified patients would benefit from an immediate follow-up by a practice nurse.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Hypertension is one of the most prevalent chronic conditions and is directly correlated to deadly risks; yet, despite the availability of effective treatment, there is still clear room for improving patient outcomes. Use of relational databases is widespread for storing patient data, but formulating queries to identify patients whose clinical management can be improved is challenging due to the temporal nature of chronic illness and the mismatch in levels of abstraction between key management concepts and coded clinical data.

Objective: The objective of this work is to develop a sharable and extensible analysis tool that can be used to identify hypertensive patients who satisfy any of a set of evidence-based criteria for quality improvement potential.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF