Validity of Postexercise Measurements to Estimate Peak VO2 in 200-m and 400-m Maximal Swims.

To assess the validity of postexercise measurements to estimate oxygen uptake (V˙O) during swimming, we compared V˙O measured directly during an all-out 200-m swim with measurements estimated during 200-m and 400-m maximal tests using several methods, including a recent heart rate (HR)/V˙O modelling procedure. 25 elite swimmers performed a 200-m maximal swim where V˙O was measured using a swimming snorkel connected to a gas analyzer. The criterion variable was V˙O in the last 20 s of effort, which was compared with the following V˙O estimates: 1) first 20-s average; 2) linear backward extrapolation (BE) of the first 20 and 30 s, 3×20-s, 4×20-s, and 3×20-s or 4×20-s averages; 3) semilogarithmic BE at the same intervals; and 4) predicted V˙O using mathematical modelling of 0-20 s and 5-20 s during recovery.

Estimating peak oxygen uptake based on postexercise measurements in swimming.

To assess the validity of postexercise measurements in estimating peak oxygen uptake (V̇O2peak) in swimming, we compared oxygen uptake (V̇O2) measurements during supramaximal exercise with various commonly adopted methods, including a recently developed heart rate - V̇O2 modelling procedure. Thirty-one elite swimmers performed a 200-m maximal swim where V̇O2 was measured breath-by-breath using a portable gas analyzer connected to a respiratory snorkel, 1 min before, during, and 3 min postexercise. V̇O2peak(-20-0) was the average of the last 20 s of effort.

A New Model for Estimating Peak Oxygen Uptake Based on Postexercise Measurements in Swimming.

Purpose: Assessing cardiopulmonary function during swimming is a complex and cumbersome procedure. Backward extrapolation is often used to predict peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak) during unimpeded swimming, but error can derive from a delay at the onset of VO2 recovery. The authors assessed the validity of a mathematical model based on heart rate (HR) and postexercise VO2 kinetics for the estimation of VO2peak during exercise.

Training load quantification in elite swimmers using a modified version of the training impulse method.

Prior reports have described the limitations of quantifying internal training loads using hear rate (HR)-based objective methods such as the training impulse (TRIMP) method, especially when high-intensity interval exercises are performed. A weakness of the TRIMP method is that it does not discriminate between exercise and rest periods, expressing both states into a single mean intensity value that could lead to an underestimate of training loads. This study was designed to compare Banister's original TRIMP method (1991) and a modified calculation procedure (TRIMPc) based on the cumulative sum of partial TRIMP, and to determine how each model relates to the session rating of perceived exertion (s-RPE), a HR-independent training load indicator.