Improved survival of uncemented versus cemented femoral stems in patients aged < 70 years in a community total joint registry.

Background: Aseptic loosening of the femoral stem remains a significant reason for revision in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Although stem fixation methods have changed over time, there is relatively little evidence supporting cemented or uncemented stems as more durable constructs.

Questions/purposes: We examined whether there was a difference in survival to revision between cemented and uncemented THA stems (1) for any reason; (2) for aseptic loosening or loosening related to wear/osteolysis; (3) based on patient age groupings (as a proxy for patient activity level); and (4) based on procedural timeframe groupings between cemented and uncemented stems.

Analysis of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in a community-based implant registry.

Using a unique community implant and explant registry, long-term survival of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty was examined and compared with total knee arthroplasty (TKA) survival. All patients with unicompartmental knee arthroplasties done since September 1, 1991 were followed up prospectively to January 31, 2002 to assess survival and reason for revision. Five hundred sixteen unicompartmental knee arthroplasties of nine different designs were done by 23 surgeons.