Introduction: Streptococcal meningoencephalitis (SME) is a rare, and frequently lethal, acute infection, and inflammation of the central nervous system parenchyma, with associated meningeal involvement. Bacterial meningoencephalitis is generally associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality, despite available antimicrobial and corticosteroid treatments. While is well recognised to cause bacterial meningitis, direct extension into the central nervous system parenchyma is rare.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMy essay 'Weakening the ethical distinction between euthanasia, palliative opioid use and palliative sedation' has recently generated some critique which I will attempt to address in this response. Regarding the empirical question of whether palliative opioid and sedative use shorten survival time, Schofield raise the three concerns that my literature review contains a cherry-picking bias through focusing solely on the palliative care population, that continuous deep palliative sedation falls beyond the scope of routine palliative care, and that my research may contribute to opiophobia and be harmful to palliative care provision globally. Materstvedt argues that euthanasia 'ends' rather than 'relieves' suffering and is not a treatment, and that the arguments in my essay are therefore predicated on a 'category mistake' and are a non-starter.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFOpioid and sedative use are common 'active' practices in the provision of mainstream palliative care services, and are typically distinguished from euthanasia on the basis that they do not shorten survival time. Even supposing that they did, it is often argued that they are justified and distinguished from euthanasia via appeal to Aquinas' Doctrine of Double Effect. In this essay, I will appraise the empirical evidence regarding opioid/sedative use and survival time, and argue for a position of agnosticism.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF