Rejoinder to the discussion on "Bayesian meta-analysis of penetrance for cancer risk".

The five discussions of our paper provide several modeling alternatives, extensions, and generalizations that can potentially guide future research in meta-analysis. In this rejoinder, we briefly summarize and comment on some of those points.

Bayesian meta-analysis of penetrance for cancer risk.

Multi-gene panel testing allows many cancer susceptibility genes to be tested quickly at a lower cost making such testing accessible to a broader population. Thus, more patients carrying pathogenic germline mutations in various cancer-susceptibility genes are being identified. This creates a great opportunity, as well as an urgent need, to counsel these patients about appropriate risk-reducing management strategies.

Validation of a Bayesian learning model to predict the risk for cannabis use disorder.

Background: Cannabis use disorder (CUD) is a growing public health problem. Early identification of adolescents and young adults at risk of developing CUD in the future may help stem this trend. A logistic regression model fitted using a Bayesian learning approach was developed recently to predict the risk of future CUD based on seven risk factors in adolescence and youth.

Meta-Analysis of Breast Cancer Risk for Individuals with PALB2 Pathogenic Variants.

Background: Pathogenic variants in cancer susceptibility genes can now be tested efficiently and economically with the wide availability of multi-gene panel testing. This has resulted in an unprecedented rate of identifying individuals carrying pathogenic variants. These carriers need to be counselled about their future cancer risk conferred by the specific gene mutation.