This study compared the degree of microleakage in the proximal walls of direct and indirect resin slot restorations in relation to the types of dentin bonding systems and the location of gingival margins. Two Class II slot preparations were prepared and restored in each of 60 extracted human molars using direct (Filtek Supreme) and indirect (Tescera ATL) restorative resin materials. Various types of dentin bonding systems, including self-etching (OneStep Plus/Tyrian SPE, iBond, Xeno III) and etch and rinse systems (All-Bond 2, Prime & Bond NT) were used to restore the prepared teeth.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFObjective: The aim of this study was to assess the effect on microleakage of cyclic lateral fatigue forces in different types of cervical resin composite restorations.
Method And Materials: V-notch cavities were prepared at the cementoenamel junction in 60 extracted human premolars and restored with a bonding system along with one of the following resin composites: hybrid resin composite, microfilled resin composite, and flowable resin composite (20 each). Ten specimens from each group of 20 were subjected to 8,400 cycles of lateral fatigue forces (44 N) at the occlusal half of the clinical crown in a machine specifically developed for this purpose.