The language of inclusion: A randomized trial of how DEI statements influence hiring practices for people with visible and invisible disabilities.

Background: Companies are increasingly motivated to ensure that they are effective at hiring people with disabilities, but bias in the process remains a challenge. While Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) statements are generally crafted as external-facing signaling devices, little is known about their potential effect on the employees themselves with regard to internal decisions, such as hiring.

Objective: This study aims to explore whether various DEI statements may encourage more positive hiring decisions for job candidates with both visible and invisible disabilities.

Beyond compliance: A randomized trial of DEI statements and subsequent signals for job seekers with disabilities.

Background: Companies are increasingly attending to their Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) statements in their public-facing documents, including job advertisements. Little is known about how various decisions about language type or placement within a job ad are received by marginalized populations, including those living with disabilities.

Objective: This study aims to explore various options for DEI statements within job ads, to assess whether these choices have a measurable impact on potential job seekers living with disabilities.

The disclosure dilemma: requesting accommodations for chronic pain in job interviews.

Purpose: This study explores the job interview process for those who need disability-related accommodations on the job (in particular an "invisible" disability such as many of the long-term and late effects of cancer and its treatment (e.g., pain, fatigue, cognitive problems)), and explores whether the communication channel or the timing of the disclosure has implications on the perceived employability of applicants, with the aim of helping to close the employment gap for this marginalized population.

Reach for your cell phone at your own risk: The cognitive costs of media choice for breaks.

Introduction: Since there is steady increase in cell phone addiction, the act of reaching for a phone between tasks, or even mid-task, is becoming more commonplace, without a true understanding about the potential cognitive costs of taking a break in this way as opposed to taking a break through another medium.

Methods: This experimental study included 414 participants who completed a cognitively demanding task (solving anagrams) either on paper or on a computer screen. Participants in three of four randomly assigned conditions engaged in a break task (selecting items for a hypothetical shopping list) either on a cell phone, a larger computer screen, or on a paper in the middle of the task.

The finer points of lying online: e-mail versus pen and paper.

The authors present 3 experimental studies that build on moral disengagement theory by exploring lying in online environments. Findings indicate that, when e-mail is compared with pen and paper communication media (both of which are equal in terms of media richness, as both are text only), people are more willing to lie when communicating via e-mail than via pen and paper and feel more justified in doing so. The findings were consistent whether the task assured participants that their lie either would or would not be discovered by their counterparts.