Purpose: The objectives of this study were to evaluate the fracture strength and fracture patterns of provisional crowns fabricated from different materials and techniques after receiving stress from a simulated oral condition.
Materials And Methods: A monomethacrylate-based resin (Unifast Trad) and a bis-acryl-based (Protemp 4) resin were used to fabricate provisional crowns using conventional direct technique. A milled monomethacrylate resin (Brylic Solid) and a 3D-printed bis-acrylate resin (Freeprint Temp) were chosen to fabricate provisional crowns using the CAD/CAM process.
Statement Of Problem: Computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) milling and 3-dimensional printing are readily available for the fabrication of interim restorations. However, studies comparing the marginal gap after a long period of function are lacking.
Purpose: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the marginal gap of interim crowns fabricated from different materials and with different techniques before and after receiving simulated oral stress.