Background Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) is an emerging modality that generates low-energy (LE) images that are visually equivalent to full-field digital mammography (FFDM) and recombined images that show lesion vascularity such as MRI. Supplemental whole-breast US increases cancer detection rates when performed with FFDM but not with MRI. Purpose To compare the performance of CEM, LE images, and LE images supplemented with whole-breast US in breast cancer detection during screening.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPurpose: This study aimed to evaluate our institution's experience in using artificial intelligence (AI) decision support (DS) as part of the clinical workflow to triage patients with Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) 3 sonographic lesions whose follow-up was delayed during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, against subsequent imaging and/or pathologic follow-up results.
Methods: This retrospective study included patients with a BI-RADS category 3 (i.e.
Objectives: Asymmetries on screening contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) often lead to patient recall. However, in diagnostic settings, negative CEM has effectively classified these as normal or benign, questioning the need for further workup of non-enhancing asymmetries (NEAs).
Material And Methods: A computational search of all screening CEM examinations performed between December-2012 and June-2021 was conducted to identify cases reporting NEAs.
Women with extremely dense breasts account for approximately 10% of the screening population and face an increased lifetime risk of developing breast cancer. At the same time, the sensitivity of mammography, the first-line screening modality, is significantly reduced in this breast density group, owing to the masking effect of the abundant fibroglandular tissue. Consequently, this population has garnered increasing scientific attention due to the unique diagnostic challenge they present.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Am Coll Radiol
June 2024
Early detection of breast cancer from regular screening substantially reduces breast cancer mortality and morbidity. Multiple different imaging modalities may be used to screen for breast cancer. Screening recommendations differ based on an individual's risk of developing breast cancer.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFObjective: To assess performance of an artificial intelligence (AI) decision support software in assessing and recommending biopsy of triple-negative breast cancers (TNBCs) on US.
Methods: Retrospective institutional review board-approved review identified patients diagnosed with TNBC after US-guided biopsy between 2009 and 2019. Artificial intelligence output for TNBCs on diagnostic US included lesion features (shape, orientation) and likelihood of malignancy category (benign, probably benign, suspicious, and probably malignant).
Rationale And Objectives: To examine the role of contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) in the work-up of palpable breast abnormalities.
Materials And Methods: In this single-center combination prospective-retrospective study, women with palpable breast abnormalities underwent CEM evaluation prospectively, comprising the acquisition of low energy (LE) images and recombined images (RI) which depict enhancement, followed by targeted ultrasound (US). Two independent readers retrospectively reviewed the imaging and assigned BI-RADS assessment based on LE alone, LE plus US, RI with LE plus US (CEM plus US), and RI alone.
Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of an Artificial Intelligence (AI) decision support (DS) system in the ultrasound (US) assessment of invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) of the breast, a cancer that can demonstrate variable appearance and present insidiously.
Methods: Retrospective review was performed of 75 patients with 83 ILC diagnosed by core biopsy or surgery between November 2017 and November 2019. ILC characteristics (size, shape, echogenicity) were recorded.
Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) may provide an alternative to magnetic resonance imaging as a diagnostic exam in women with known or suspected breast cancer or as a screening exam in women at increased risk of breast cancer. Women with breast augmentation, either for oncologic or cosmetic reasons, may fall into this increased risk population and need safe and effective screening and diagnostic imaging tools. Here, we present our clinical practice data in order to demonstrate the feasibility of CEM in women with breast implants.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFContrast-enhanced digital mammography (CEDM) has been shown to outperform standard mammography while performing comparably to contrast-enhanced MRI. The purpose of our study was to compare imaging characteristics of false-positive and true-positive findings on CEDM. This retrospective study included women who underwent baseline screening CEDM between January 2013 and December 2018 assessed as BI-RADS category 0, 3, 4, or 5 and who underwent biopsy with histopathologic diagnosis or had a 2-year imaging follow-up.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFThe objective of this study was to assess to the role of contrast-enhanced digital mammography (CEDM) as a screening tool in women at intermediate risk for developing breast cancer due to a personal history of lobular neoplasia without additional risk factors. In this institutional review board-approved, observational, retrospective study, we reviewed our radiology department database to identify patients with a personal history of breast biopsy yielding lobular neoplasia who underwent screening CEDM at our institution between December 2012 and February 2019. A total of 132 women who underwent 306 CEDM examinations were included.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFObjective: To compare outcome metrics of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) breast cancer screening with full-field digital mammogram (FFDM); specifically, to compare recall rates by the type of recalled finding, and to assess if screening with DBT versus FFDM changes biopsy recommendations and if the likelihood of malignancy varied by lesion type, if detected on DBT or FFDM screening mammogram.
Methods: The outcomes of 22,055 FFDM and DBT screening mammograms were retrospectively reviewed. The exams were performed at an academic institution between August 2015 and September 2016.
Rationale And Objectives: Our objective was to identify factors impacting false positive recalls in screening mammography.
Materials And Methods: We retrospectively reviewed our screening mammography database from August 31, 2015 to September 30, 2016, including full field digital mammograms (FFDM) and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) mammograms. False positive (FP) exams were defined as Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) 1 or 2 assessments at diagnostic imaging with 1 year cancer-free follow-up, Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System 3 assessment at diagnostic imaging with 2 years cancer free follow-up, or biopsy with benign pathology.
Patient satisfaction and department efficiency are central pillars in defining quality in medicine. Patient satisfaction is often linked to wait times. We describe a novel method to study workflow and simulate solutions to improve efficiency, thereby decreasing wait times and adding value.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFProstate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is a type II transmembrane glycoprotein that is highly overexpressed on prostate cancer epithelial cells and for which there is a growing body of literature examining the role of small-molecule and antibody radiotracers targeted against this protein for prostate cancer detection and therapy. Despite its name, PSMA is also expressed, to varying degrees, in the neovasculature of a wide variety of nonprostate cancers; indeed, the pathology literature is replete with promising immunohistochemistry findings. Several groups have begun to correlate those pathology-level results with in vivo imaging and therapy in nonprostate cancers using the same PSMA-targeted agents that have been so successful in prostate cancer.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: Fetal ventriculomegaly is a common and frequently leading neuroimaging finding in complex brain malformations. Here we report on pre- and postnatal neuroimaging findings in three fetuses with prenatal ventriculomegaly and brainstem kinking. We aim to identify key neuroimaging features that may allow the prenatal differentiation between diseases associated with fetal ventriculomegaly and brainstem kinking.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFKaposiform hemangioendothelioma (KHE) is a vascular tumor with poor prognosis. We present a child with progressive disability, extreme pain, and autonomic dysfunction due to a retroperitoneal KHE where radiologic characteristics were essential for diagnosis and monitoring of response to therapy. He received sirolimus, and the symptomatology resolved completely.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF