Background: The primary aim of the present study was to evaluate whether usage of self-gripping mesh in open inguinal hernia repair, compared with standard Lichtenstein repair with sutured mesh, could result in a decreased rate of chronic pain. The secondary aim was to evaluate the rate of foreign body feeling, hernia recurrence, and risk factors for chronic pain development.
Methods: The patients were randomized into two study groups: the OLP group received Optilene LP mesh and the PPG group received self-gripping Parietex ProGrip mesh.
Purpose: The definition of chronic pain after inguinal hernioplasty and the methods of its assessment vary a great deal, which make it complicated to conduct meta-analyses. The primary aim of the present prospective study was to evaluate at which pain severity degree the quality-of-life scores will be reduced.
Method: A prospective study of patients operated for inguinal hernia was conducted.
Background And Aims: The aim of the present study was to determine whether usage of mesh with larger pores, compared with mesh with smaller pores, would result in a decreased rate of chronic pain at 3-year follow-up. According to earlier published short-term results, differences in mesh pore size do not influence the rate of chronic pain.
Material And Methods: The patients were randomized into two study groups for which meshes with similar weight but different pore size were used: the UM group received Ultrapro mesh (pore size 3-4 mm) and the OM group received Optilene LP mesh (pore size 1 mm).
Background: The primary aim of the present study was to evaluate whether usage of self-gripping mesh in open inguinal hernia repair, compared with standard Lichtenstein repair with sutured mesh, could result in a decreased rate of chronic pain at 6-mo follow-up. The secondary outcome was to evaluate foreign body feeling and the quality of life after inguinal hernia repair.
Methods: The patients were randomized into two study groups as follows: the OLP group received Optilene LP mesh and the PPG group received self-gripping Parietex ProGrip mesh.
Background: The primary aim of this study was to determine whether mesh pore size influences the rate of chronic pain at 6-mo follow-up. Another aim was to evaluate the rate of foreign body feeling and quality of life after inguinal hernia repair.
Methods: The patients were randomized into two study groups: the UM group received Ultrapro mesh (pore size 3-4 mm) and the OM group received Optilene LP mesh (pore size 1 mm).