The pleasurable urge to move to music is unchanged in people with musical anhedonia.

In cognitive science, the sensation of "groove" has been defined as the pleasurable urge to move to music. When listeners rate rhythmic stimuli on derived pleasure and urge to move, ratings on these dimensions are highly correlated. However, recent behavioural and brain imaging work has shown that these two components may be separable.

Optimal Cutoff Values and Utility of High-Sensitivity Troponin T and NT-proBNP for the Risk Stratification of Patients with Acute Pulmonary Embolism.

Background: Guidelines recommend using high-sensitivity troponin T (hsTnT) and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) to risk stratify hemodynamically stable patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE). However, there are no evidence-based cutoff values defined for this clinical application.

Methods: We performed a single-center, retrospective cohort study of patients with imaging-confirmed PE and hsTnT and/or NT-proBNP (ElecsysTM, Roche) measured 12 h before or 24 h after PE Response Team (PERT) activation.

Comparison of Working Conditions Between Immigrant and Non-immigrant Healthcare Workers in the United States: Evidence From the National Health Interview Survey.

Immigrants in the United States (U.S.) healthcare workforce face challenging working conditions.

Breaking the Wheel, Credibility, and Hermeneutical Injustice: A Response to Harris.

In this short paper, I respond to Keith Raymond Harris' paper "Synthetic Media, The Wheel, and the Burden of Proof". In particular, I examine his arguments against two prominent approaches employed to deal with synthetic media such as deepfakes and other GenAI content, namely, the "reactive" and "proactive" approaches. In the first part, I raise a worry about the problem Harris levels at the reactive approach, before providing a constructive way of expanding his worry regarding the proactive approach.

Perceptions and Current Practices of Radiologist Assistants' Peer-Review Process.

Purpose: To explore the perceptions and current practices of radiologist assistants' peer-review process.

Methods: A 49-question, anonymous, online questionnaire was emailed to 133 radiologist assistants in the American Registry of Radiologic Technologists database. Descriptive statistics were used for data analyses.