Predictive markers of response to immune checkpoint inhibitor rechallenge in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.

Aim: The present study aims to evaluate the efficacy of rechallenge with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) compared to chemotherapy and the predictive role of clinical parameters in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who were rechallenged.

Methods: The study included 113 metastatic NSCLC patients who had initially responded to ICIs and platinum-based chemotherapy, either in combination in the first line or sequentially in the first and second line, but later experienced disease progression. Of those patients, 52 later received ICI rechallenge and 61 were exposed to chemotherapy.

Inflammatory and autoimmune predictive markers of response to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy in NSCLC and melanoma.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are a standard in cancer therapy, but few patients respond to the treatment. The aim of the present study was the determination of immunological markers for monitoring response to ICI. The present study included 74 patients receiving ICI in subsequent [group 1; non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)] and first-line setting (group 2; melanoma) and 30 patients with NSCLC receiving first-line chemotherapy.

Efficacy of lorlatinib in lung carcinomas carrying distinct ALK translocation variants: The results of a single-center study.

Background: Lorlatinib is a novel potent ALK inhibitor, with only a few studies reporting the results of its clinical use.

Methods: This study describes the outcomes of lorlatinib treatment for 35 non-small cell lung cancer patients with ALK rearrangements, who had 2 (n = 5), 1 (n = 26) or none (n = 4) prior tyrosine kinase inhibitors and received lorlatinib mainly within the compassionate use program.

Results: Objective tumor response (OR) and disease control (DC) were registered in 15/35 (43%) and 33/35 (94%) patients, respectively; brain metastases were particularly responsive to the treatment (OR: 22/27 (81%); DC: 27/27 (100%)).

Variability in lung cancer response to ALK inhibitors cannot be explained by the diversity of ALK fusion variants.

Multiple laboratory evidences indicate that distinct variants of ALK translocations differ in their biochemical properties and responsiveness to ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). These data are supported by some clinical studies, which showed improved responses to crizotinib in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients carrying particular variants of ALK translocation. We retrospectively considered 64 Russian patients with ALK-rearranged NSCLC, who were treated by crizotinib (n = 23), ceritinib (n = 39) or alectinib (n = 2).