A Statewide Program to Improve Management of Suspected Urinary Tract Infection in Long-Term Care.

Background/objectives: Suspected urinary tract infection (UTI) is the most common indication for antibiotic use in long-term care (LTC). Due to the high prevalence of asymptomatic bacteriuria, for which antibiotics are not warranted, these antibiotics are frequently unnecessary. We implemented a collaborative quality improvement program to improve the management of suspected UTI in LTC residents by increasing awareness of current guidelines, with a focus on decreasing treatment in the absence of symptoms.

A patient-centered primary care practice approach using evidence-based quality improvement: rationale, methods, and early assessment of implementation.

Background: Healthcare systems and their primary care practices are redesigning to achieve goals identified in Patient-Centered Medical Home (PCMH) models such as Veterans Affairs (VA)'s Patient Aligned Care Teams (PACT). Implementation of these models, however, requires major transformation. Evidence-Based Quality Improvement (EBQI) is a multi-level approach for supporting organizational change and innovation spread.

How can we recognize continuous quality improvement?

Objective: Continuous quality improvement (CQI) methods are foundational approaches to improving healthcare delivery. Publications using the term CQI, however, are methodologically heterogeneous, and labels other than CQI are used to signify relevant approaches. Standards for identifying the use of CQI based on its key methodological features could enable more effective learning across quality improvement (QI) efforts.

Conducting online expert panels: a feasibility and experimental replicability study.

Background: This paper has two goals. First, we explore the feasibility of conducting online expert panels to facilitate consensus finding among a large number of geographically distributed stakeholders. Second, we test the replicability of panel findings across four panels of different size.

Economic analysis of a randomized trial of academic detailing interventions to improve use of antihypertensive medications.

The authors estimated the costs and cost savings of implementing a program of mailed practice guidelines and single-visit individual and group academic detailing interventions in a randomized controlled trial to improve the use of antihypertensive medications. Analyses took the perspective of the payer. The total costs of the mailed guideline, group detailing, and individual detailing interventions were estimated at 1000 dollars, 5500 dollars, and 7200 dollars, respectively, corresponding to changes in the average daily per person drug costs of -0.

Clinical and nonclinical correlates of adherence to prescribing guidelines for hypertension in a large managed care organization.

To examine correlates of guideline adherence in a population with access to health care and prescription drug benefits, the authors conducted a cross-sectional analysis among 5789 patients undergoing hypertension treatment with a single medication in a large New England managed care organization. Logistic regression was used to determine correlates of adherence, defined as use of diuretics or beta blocker as antihypertensive monotherapy during the 1-year study period. Women were more likely than men to receive guideline-adherent therapy (odds ratio [OR], 1.

Group versus individual academic detailing to improve the use of antihypertensive medications in primary care: a cluster-randomized controlled trial.

Purpose: To compare group versus individual academic detailing to increase diuretic or beta-blocker use in hypertension.

Methods: We conducted a cluster-randomized controlled trial in a large health maintenance organization. Subjects (N=9820) were patients with newly treated hypertension in the year preceding the intervention (N=3692), the 9 months following the intervention (N=3556), and the second year following intervention (N=2572).

Barriers to first-week follow-up of newborns: findings from parent and clinician focus groups.

Background: Monitoring newborns within the first week is critical to assess the adequacy of feeding and weight gain and to identify instances of hyperbilirubinemia. As systems of maternal and newborn care have become increasingly fragmented, infants are at increased risk of poor outcomes because of poor follow-up. Structured focus groups were conducted in June--July 2001 to provide information about the barriers to timely newborn follow-up and strategies to address them.