An oligonucleotide bioanalytical LC-SRM methodology entirely liberated from ion-pairing.

Reliable quantitative LC-MS methodology has been established and validated for an oligonucleotide in plasma in a fresh and unique fashion, free of ion-pairing reagents and the various associated deleterious effects from primary solution preparation through sample preparation and extraction to the LC-MS analytical end point, offering a highly selective mixed-mode solid-phase extraction with hydrophilic-interaction liquid chromatography as the chromatographic element prior to SRM detection. Inter- and intra-assay accuracy and precision ranged from 97.9 to 111% and 2.

11th GCC Closed Forum: cumulative stability; matrix stability; immunogenicity assays; laboratory manuals; biosimilars; chiral methods; hybrid LBA/LCMS assays; fit-for-purpose validation; China Food and Drug Administration bioanalytical method validation.

The 11th Global CRO Council Closed Forum was held in Universal City, CA, USA on 3 April 2017. Representatives from international CRO members offering bioanalytical services were in attendance in order to discuss scientific and regulatory issues specific to bioanalysis. The second CRO-Pharma Scientific Interchange Meeting was held on 7 April 2017, which included Pharma representatives' sharing perspectives on the topics discussed earlier in the week with the CRO members.

Nonclinical dose formulation: out of specification investigations.

Nonclinical safety studies are required to follow applicable Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) regulations. Nonclinical dose formulations are required to be analyzed to confirm the analyte concentration, homogeneity, and stability. Analytical samples that fall outside of the acceptance criteria are considered out of specification (OOS), and an investigation should be conducted.

Nonclinical dose formulation analysis method validation and sample analysis.

Nonclinical dose formulation analysis methods are used to confirm test article concentration and homogeneity in formulations and determine formulation stability in support of regulated nonclinical studies. There is currently no regulatory guidance for nonclinical dose formulation analysis method validation or sample analysis. Regulatory guidance for the validation of analytical procedures has been developed for drug product/formulation testing; however, verification of the formulation concentrations falls under the framework of GLP regulations (not GMP).

Interlaboratory comparison study of serum total testosterone [corrected] measurements performed by mass spectrometry methods.

Background: Though mass spectrometry (MS) assays are increasingly used for routine clinical measurements of serum total testosterone (TT), information about the variability of results is limited. This study assessed the variability of TT measurement results from routine MS assays.

Methods: Twenty serum samples (12 females, 8 males) were analyzed on 2 days by seven high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), and one gas chromatography (GC)-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS, GC-MS/MS) assays.

Superiority of gas chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry assay (GC/MS/MS) for estradiol for monitoring of aromatase inhibitor therapy.

Currently available radioimmunoassay methods for estradiol in serum lack sufficient sensitivity and precision to monitor estradiol levels in patients placed on third generation aromatase inhibitors. We recently validated a gas chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry assay (GC/MS/MS) for estradiol and determined estrogen levels in normal post-menopausal women and in women with breast cancer before and during administration of aromatase inhibitors. Validation of the GC/MS/MS assay in human plasma and human serum included determination of assay sensitivity (<0.

Recombinant cell ultrasensitive bioassay for measurement of estrogens in postmenopausal women.

A recent analysis of data from nine studies provided convincing evidence that plasma estradiol measurements predict the risk of breast cancer in normal postmenopausal women. However, the median values detected by the various assays used in this study varied by 5-fold. These and other published data in normal postmenopausal women suggest that assays measuring low plasma estradiol concentrations suffer from problems of sensitivity, specificity, and precision.