Publications by authors named "Supanee Buranadham"
Introduction: This study, conducted within an educational design research (EDR) framework, assessed the use of customized 3D-printed tooth models at various difficulty levels to enhance mastery learning and deliberate practice in preclinical endodontic training.
Methods: The EDR was conducted in a preclinical endodontic training involving 42 third-year students. The study focused on developing and evaluating 3D-printed tooth models customized into 3 difficulty levels to facilitate mastery learning for the access opening procedure on upper anterior teeth.
Objectives: To assess the effect of glass-ceramic coated zirconia versus alumina air-abraded zirconia on the shear bond strength (SBS) of resin cement and investigate the residual stresses present on both mechanically pre-treated surfaces.
Materials And Methods: A total of 180 zirconia disks, with diameters of 10 mm and 5 mm, were divided into two groups: DCMhotbond glass-ceramic coated, followed by hydrofluoric acid etching (DCM), and alumina air-abraded (AB). All mechanically pre-treated disks were conditioned with G-Multi Primer and bonded using G-Cem Linkforce Cement.
Bioresorbable polymeric membranes for guided bone regeneration (GBR) were fabricated using the three-dimensional printing technique. Membranes made of polylactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA), which consist of lactic acid (LA) and glycolic acid in ratios of 10:90 (group A) and 70:30 (group B), were compared. Their physical characteristics including architecture, surface wettability, mechanical properties, and degradability were compared in vitro, and their biocompatibilities were compared in vitro and in vivo.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPurpose: To investigate microtensile bond strength and characterization with the novel lithium disilicate coating technique compared to conventional air abrasion.
Materials And Methods: Eight zirconia blocks were fabricated and assigned to two groups (n = 4 each): (1) Lithium disilicate coating followed by hydrofluoric acid etching and Monobond N Primer (LiDi group); and (2) alumina air abrasion (MUL group). For each group, two identically pretreated zirconia blocks were bonded together with Multilink Speed Cement and cut into 30 stick-shaped specimens (1 × 1 × 9 mm3).
Objectives: To compare ceramic-coating techniques versus conventional techniques on bonding between composite cements and zirconia by means of strain energy release rate (G, J/m).
Methods: Two sizes of zirconia bars (30 mm × 8 mm × 1.5 mm and 14.
Purpose: To compare the shear bond strength of composite cement to lithium-disilicate glass-ceramic coated zirconia vs to alumina air-abraded zirconia and to analyze the residual stresses on both of lithium-disilicate glass-ceramic coated zirconia vs alumina air-abraded zirconia specimens.
Materials And Methods: One hundred eighty zirconia disks (diameters 10 mm and 5 mm, 4.5 mm thick) were divided into two groups: lithium-disilicate glass-ceramic coating followed by hydrofluoric acid etching and Monobond N Primer (LiDi) or alumina air-abrasion (AA).
Objectives: To compare the shear bond strength of composite-resin cement to nano-structured alumina-coated versus to tribochemical silica-treated zirconia, and to analyze the residual stresses on both of nano-structured alumina-coated versus tribochemical silica-treated zirconia specimens.
Methods: One hundred and eighty zirconia disks (10 mm and 5 mm in diameter, 5 mm thickness) were divided into two groups: nano-structured alumina coating (H.C.
Objective: The aims of this study were to compare micro-tensile bond strength and characterize the bond of ceramic-coated versus air-abraded and chemically treated zirconia specimens.
Methods: Eight zirconia blocks were fabricated and assigned to two groups as follows: AA-alumina air-abrasion; and CC-DCMhotbond coating followed by alumina air-abrasion and hydrofluoric acid etching. For each group, two identically pre-treated zirconia blocks were applied G-Multi Primer, cemented together with G-Cem Linkforce cement and cut into 30 stick-shaped specimens (1×1×9mm).
Purpose: To compare microtensile bond strength and characterize the bond of nano-structured alumina-coated vs tribochemically silica-treated zirconia specimens.
Materials And Methods: Eight zirconia blocks were assigned to two groups: nano-structured alumina coating (AlN) and tribochemical silica treatment (CoJet) followed by RelyX Ceramic Primer (COJ). For each group, two identically pre-treated zirconia blocks were bonded with RelyX Unicem 2 Cement and cut into 30 stick-shaped specimens (1 x 1 x 9 mm3).