Another look at paradoxical severity effects in head injury with the Personality Assessment Inventory.

Previous investigations of psychiatric symptomatology after head injury using the MMPI-2 (Butcher, Dahlstrom, Graham, Tellegen, & Kaemmer, 1989) have consistently revealed greater Basic scale elevations in mild injuries versus more severe injuries. In this study, we tested this pattern of paradoxical severity effects using the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI; Morey, 1991). We gathered PAI and MMPI-2 data from 34 patients with moderate-to-severe head injuries and from 52 patients with mild head injuries.

Detecting insufficient effort using the Seashore Rhythm and Speech-Sounds Perception Tests in head injury.

This study examined the capacity of the Seashore Rhythm Test (SRT) and the Speech-Sounds Perception Test (SSPT) to detect insufficient effort in a clinical sample. Forty-six participants with financially compensable mild head injury who obtained scores indicative of insufficient effort on multiple measures were compared to 49 participants with brain injury who were not involved in litigation. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis indicated that both the SRT (AUC = .

Patient-informant agreement on personality ratings and self-awareness after head injury.

To address concerns about self-awareness deficits and the validity of self-ratings by patients with head injury (HI), the current study examines mean differences and correlations between self-ratings from 52 patients with HI and ratings of the patient by informants using the revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R). Patient self-ratings were significantly lower than informant ratings on neuroticism and extraversion and significantly higher on conscientiousness. Patient-informant correlations ranged from .

Psychological disturbance, incomplete effort, and compensation-seeking status as predictors of neuropsychological test performance in head injury.

Indices from the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2; Butcher, Dahlstrom, Graham, Tellegen, & Kaemmer, 1989) representing cognitive and emotional disturbance as well as incomplete effort on the Recognition Memory Test (RMT; Warrington, 1984) were examined as predictors of performance on the Halstead-Reitan Neuropsychological Test Battery (HRB; Reitan & Wolfson, 1993). In the current study, which included a large sample (N = 369) of patients referred for neuropsychological (NP) evaluation after presumptive head injury, MMPI-2 measures of psychological disturbance accounted for as much as 25% of the variance in HRB test scores, resulting in a moderate overall effect size (median Adj. R(2) = .

MMPI-2 indices of psychological disturbance and attention and memory test performance in head injury.

A number of studies have investigated the relationship between psychological disturbance and neuropsychological (NP) test performance. The current study is a replication and extension of who found that MMPI-2 indices of psychological disturbance are related to performance on NP tests of attention and memory in psychiatric and head-injured patients. In a large sample (N=381) referred for evaluation after sustaining presumed head injury, we examined the relationship between MMPI-2 indices of psychological disturbance and measures of attention and memory from the Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised (WMS-R), Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised (WAIS-R), California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT), and the Memory Assessment Scales (MAS).