How I do it: Aquablation in very large prostates (> 150 mL).

Aquablation has been well-studied in prostates sizes up to 150 mL. Recently, American Urological Association guidelines distinguish surgical interventions for men with large prostates (80 mL-150 mL) and now very large prostates (> 150 mL). Readers will gain an understanding of how to use Aquablation in the very large prostate size category.

Men with lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to BPH undergoing Aquablation with very large prostates (> 150 mL).

Introduction: The AUA guidelines for benign prostatic hyperplasia distinguish treatments based upon prostate volume (PV), particularly for very large prostates (> 150 mL). While the clinical outcomes and benefits of Aquablation have been studied for men with average and large prostates, it is unknown whether this technology can be used for very large prostates.

Materials And Methods: Men with PV > 150 mL undergoing Aquablation were identified retrospectively from four North American hospitals.

Familiarity and self-reported compliance with American Urological Association best practice recommendations for use of thromboembolic prophylaxis among American Urological Association members.

Purpose: Thromboprophylaxis with subcutaneous heparin or low molecular weight heparin is now an integral part of national surgical quality and safety assessment efforts, and has been incorporated into the current AUA Best Practice Statement. We evaluated familiarity and compliance with the AUA Best Practice Statement, assessed practice patterns in terms of perioperative thromboprophylaxis and specifically examined self-reported compliance in high risk patients undergoing radical cystectomy.

Materials And Methods: An electronic survey was sent to AUA members with valid e-mail addresses (10,966).

Prolonged natural progression from localized to symptomatic renal cell carcinoma.

Surgical excision is the gold standard therapy for clinically localized renal masses. Nevertheless, prognostication of the natural history of untreated renal cell carcinoma (RCC) remains a clinical challenge. While active surveillance (AS) has emerged as a viable treatment option in select patients with localized tumors and significant competing mortality risks, long term follow up data to assess the risk of disease progression are limited.