Strategies to Mitigate the Pandemic Aftermath on Perioperative Professionalism.

Background: This retrospective comparative cohort study aimed to evaluate the effects of COVID-19 on professionalism within the perioperative environment of a tertiary cancer center across three periods: pre-pandemic, pandemic, and an interventional endemic phase.

Methods: A retrospective observational review of a prospectively maintained safety event report (SER) database at MD Anderson Cancer Center, with an intervention during the COVID-19 endemic phase, was conducted. This was performed to compare the incidence of professionalism-related events (PRE), which are included in the SER database, during the COVID-19 pandemic period (March 2020 to May 2022), with a pre-pandemic period (September 2011 to February 2020) and a postintervention endemic phase (June 2022 to March 2023).

Interprofessional teamwork in healthcare: Observations and the road ahead.

In this effort we draw from the literature on interprofessional teamwork in high reliability organizations from different fields of study, including healthcare, industrial/organizational psychology, and management. We combine this literature with our collective experience to offer five observations on future needs for the field of team science research and practice. These themes include: (1) exploration of nonclinical teams, (2) evaluation of multi-team systems in healthcare, (3) the study of dyad leadership of teams, (4) the proliferation of virtual healthcare teams, and (5) the continuing integration of organizational and team science into the study of interprofessional teams.

Core conditions of team effectiveness: Development of a survey measuring Hackman's framework.

Leaders and team development practitioners working toward increasing interprofessional team effectiveness frequently need to quickly and accurately determine the extent to which a team possesses the most essential and foundational components required for effective teamwork. While there is no shortage of team theories, there are few freely available, practical, short, and well-developed surveys to measure team functioning across a variety of team types. We developed a 9-item team assessment to fill this gap in the literature, measuring the most fundamental criteria for optimising team functioning, based on Hackman's widely used framework of the foundational conditions for team effectiveness.