Current transfusion practices of members of the american society of anesthesiologists: a survey.

Background: The last published survey of transfusion practices among members of the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) was conducted in 1981. The ASA Committee on Transfusion Medicine conducted a new transfusion survey in 2002.

Methods: The survey was mailed to 2,500 randomly selected active ASA members.

Practice parameter for the use of red blood cell transfusions: developed by the Red Blood Cell Administration Practice Guideline Development Task Force of the College of American Pathologists.

A practice parameter has been developed to assist physicians in the therapeutic use of red blood cell transfusions. The developers of this parameter used the best available information from the medical literature, as well as clinical experience and the extensive reality testing required by the College of American Pathologists for approval. In acute anemia, a fall in hemoglobin values below 6 g/dL or a rapid blood volume loss of more than 30% to 40% requires red blood cell transfusions in most patients.

Nationwide survey of home transfusion practices.

Background: Limited information exists on home transfusion practices.

Study Design And Methods: In 1995, a survey requesting data for 1994 was sent to 1273 American Association of Blood Banks (AABB) institutional members and 113 non-AABB home health care agencies that provide out-of-hospital transfusions.

Results: Of 943 respondents, 102 provide blood to a home transfusion program, 37 provide blood and run a home transfusion program, and 13 run a home transfusion program only, for a total of 152 (16%) with some involvement in home blood transfusions.

Guidelines for blood utilization review.

Hospitals are required by accrediting agencies to perform blood utilization review. Specific areas that must be addressed are the ordering, distribution, handling, dispensing, and administration of blood components. Monitoring the effects of transfusion on patients is also required.

The red blood cell transfusion trigger. Physiology and clinical studies.

The need for red blood cell transfusion is determined by the etiology, chronicity, and severity of anemia, the patient's ability to compensate for decreased oxygen carrying capacity, and tissue oxygen requirements. The compensatory mechanisms invoked by acute blood loss differ from the physiologic adaptations to chronic anemia. Factors such as myocardial depression and inadequate ventilation can also decrease oxygen delivery, but their occurrence cannot be reliably predicted, particularly in surgical patients.

Controversies in transfusion medicine. Perioperative hemodilution: pro.

Hemodilution can obviate the need for allogeneic transfusion in some patients. However, it is only one component of a comprehensive blood conservation program and should be combined with other techniques whenever possible. While most often employed in teenagers and healthy young adults, ANH has been used in small children, the elderly, and patients of all ages who are undergoing cardiac surgery.

Preoperative autologous donation: surgery clinic staff knowledge/attitudes. Preoperative Autologous Blood Donation Study Group.

Preoperative autologous blood donation (PABD) is both under- and overused. Although the decision to order PABD lies with the surgeon, it is quite likely that other surgery clinic personnel influence patient acceptance and enrollment into PABD programs. Accordingly, we measured knowledge, attitudes, and the referral practice of clinic personnel pertaining to PABD.

Efficacy of preoperative donation of blood for autologous use in radical prostatectomy.

To determine the amount of blood lost, the number of transfusions, and the effectiveness of preoperative autologous blood donation in radical prostatectomy, 163 patients' records from 1987 to 1991 were reviewed at four university hospitals and three community hospitals. Calculated red cell volume lost was 1003 +/- 535 mL (mean +/- SD), which corresponds to 44 +/- 18 percent (mean +/- SD) of total red cell volume. Preoperative donation of blood for autologous use reduced the rate of transfusion of allogeneic blood from 66 to 20 percent (p < 0.

Improvement in appropriate autologous donations with local education: 1987 to 1989.

Preoperative autologous blood donation for elective surgery patients at university hospitals was underused in the past. More recently, national educational efforts have been made. To test the impact of local surgeon interviews and education, in 1988 the same local educational program was instituted at three university hospitals; three community hospitals were used as controls.

Blood loss and replacement in total hip arthroplasty: a multicenter study. The Preoperative Autologous Blood Donation Study Group.

To determine blood loss, the number of transfusions, and the hemoglobin levels achieved in patients via transfusion in the course of total hip arthroplasty, 324 patient records from 1987 through 1989 were reviewed at three university and three community hospitals. Calculated blood loss was 3.2 +/- 1.

Probable reasons that autologous blood was not donated by patients having surgery for which crossmatched blood was ordered.

Preoperative autologous blood donation is used by only a small percentage of surgery patients for whom crossmatched blood is ordered. To document the reasons the patients failed to donate, the medical records of surgical patients at three university and three community hospitals were studied. All procedures for which crossmatched blood was ordered, but for which autologous blood was not available, were included (n = 8121).

Indications for perioperative blood transfusion in 1990.

Rational transfusion practices are determined by clinical evaluation and utilization of appropriate laboratory tests. While the trend toward more conservative transfusion practices is laudable, blood transfusions should not be withheld because of fear of transfusion-transmitted disease. The blood supply is safer than ever before and advances in monitoring and laboratory testing are facilitating scientific approaches to blood administration.

Donor room personnel attitudes toward autologous donors.

Patients with serious illnesses who donate their blood for autologous use create anxiety for many phlebotomists. Donor room staff were surveyed at three donor centers, using confidential questionnaires, to identify their concerns and to evaluate factors associated with reduced anxiety toward autologous donors. Among respondents (n = 93), 58 percent had patient care experience within the last 5 years, which correlated with diminished concern about phlebotomizing cardiac patients (r = .

Autologous blood salvage procedures.

Autologous transfusion is not a luxury. Some states have passed legislation mandating that surgical patients be informed of the alternatives to homologous blood administration as well as the risks and benefits of transfusion. Technological advances have made autologous blood salvage in surgery, the postoperative period, and certain trauma situations a safe and relatively inexpensive procedure.

Surgeons' knowledge, attitude, and use of preoperative autologous blood donation.

Before a comprehensive educational program on preoperative autologous blood donation was begun, 118 surgeons from three different areas of the country were tested to assess their baseline knowledge and attitude about this practice. Test results were correlated with the percentage of eligible patients that the surgeons actually referred for preoperative donation during a period of observation. The purpose of this preliminary effort was to identify areas in the educational program that required emphasis.

Donation reactions among autologous donors.

Studies of risk factors associated with reactions among autologous blood donors have been limited. Therefore, 2091 autologous and 4737 homologous donations were examined. Donors at greatest risk for reaction were autologous donors who had reactions at first donation; among 45 who made repeat donations for the same surgery, 17 (38%) had repeat reactions.

Moderate and severe reactions during autologous blood donations are no more frequent than during homologous blood donations.

Because autologous donation is permitted for donors who do not meet homologous blood donation standards, referring physicians and blood center personnel may be concerned about autologous donor reactions. Small studies have determined that mild reactions do not occur more frequently, but the incidence of rarer, more serious, moderate and severe reactions is unknown. We therefore studied the frequency of reactions during 10,200 autologous and 219,307 concurrent homologous donations at four blood centers.