Background: Surgical management of midcarpal instability (MCI), also referred to as carpal instability nondissociative, remains controversial because of limited evidence on different techniques. This study aimed to assess and compare differences in patient-reported pain, hand and wrist function, satisfaction, range of motion, and return to work in patients with nontraumatic MCI who underwent surgical treatment either through dorsal wrist capsulodesis or 3-ligament tenodesis (3LT).
Methods: Patients with MCI and persisting complaints after conservative therapy treated with 3LT or dorsal capsulodesis were included.
Background: The authors hypothesized that the 3-ligament tenodesis (3-LT) procedure is still sufficient-even in scapholunate advanced collapse (SLAC) cases-to reduce pain and improve wrist function. The authors compared patient-reported outcomes of scapholunate interosseus ligament (SLIL) injury patients with SLAC, to SLIL injury patients treated with 3-LT, and then to patients who underwent proximal row carpectomy (PRC), as a control group.
Methods: The authors included all patients with a traumatic SLIL injury and associated SLAC components treated with 3-LT and completed patient-rated wrist evaluation (PRWE) questionnaires preoperatively and at 12-month follow-up.
Purpose: Multiple studies report outcomes after 3-ligament tenodesis (3-LT) in treating traumatic scapholunate interosseous ligament injury (SLIL). However, investigators do not differentiate between patients with partial or complete SLIL injury. The relation between the extent of SLIL disruption and surgical outcomes and if this should be considered when treating a patient with SLIL injury remains unknown.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF