Publications by authors named "Stacey M Anderson"

Background: Automated closed-loop control (CLC), known as the "artificial pancreas" is emerging as a treatment option for Type 1 Diabetes (T1D), generally superior to sensor-augmented insulin pump (SAP) treatment. It is postulated that evening-night (E-N) CLC may account for most of the benefits of 24-7 CLC; however, a direct comparison has not been done.

Methods: In this trial (NCT02679287), adults with T1D were randomised 1:1 to two groups, which followed different sequences of four 8-week sessions, resulting in two crossover designs comparing SAP vs E-N CLC and E-N CLC vs 24-7 CLC, respectively.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study aimed to compare glycemic control outcomes between a closed-loop control (CLC) system and a predictive low-glucose suspend (PLGS) system in individuals with type 1 diabetes after an initial 6-month period of using the CLC system.
  • A total of 109 participants were randomly assigned to either the CLC group or the PLGS group for an additional 3 months, measuring time in range (TIR) and HbA1c levels.
  • Results showed that the CLC group had significantly better TIR and lower HbA1c levels compared to the PLGS group, indicating worse glycemic control after transitioning to PLGS, while the incidence of hypoglycemia remained similar in both groups.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: Insulin dosing in type 1 diabetes (T1D) is oftentimes complicated by fluctuating insulin requirements driven by metabolic and psychobehavioral factors impacting individuals' insulin sensitivity (IS). In this context, smart bolus calculators that automatically tailor prandial insulin dosing to the metabolic state of a person can improve glucose management in T1D.

Research Design And Methods: Fifteen adults with T1D using continuous glucose monitors (CGMs) and insulin pumps completed two 24-h admissions in a hotel setting.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

To assess the safety and efficacy of a simplified initialization for the Tandem t:slim X2 Control-IQ hybrid closed-loop system, using parameters based on total daily insulin ("MyTDI") in adolescents with type 1 diabetes under usual activity and during periods of increased exercise. Adolescents with type 1 diabetes 12-18 years of age used Control-IQ for 5 days at home using their usual parameters. Upon arrival at a 60-h ski camp, participants were randomized to either continue Control-IQ using their home settings or to reinitialize Control-IQ with MyTDI parameters.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: Assess the efficacy of inControl AP, a mobile closed-loop control (CLC) system.

Research Design And Methods: This protocol, NCT02985866, is a 3-month parallel-group, multicenter, randomized unblinded trial designed to compare mobile CLC with sensor-augmented pump (SAP) therapy. Eligibility criteria were type 1 diabetes for at least 1 year, use of insulin pumps for at least 6 months, age ≥14 years, and baseline HbA <10.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Closed-loop systems that automate insulin delivery may improve glycemic outcomes in patients with type 1 diabetes.

Methods: In this 6-month randomized, multicenter trial, patients with type 1 diabetes were assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive treatment with a closed-loop system (closed-loop group) or a sensor-augmented pump (control group). The primary outcome was the percentage of time that the blood glucose level was within the target range of 70 to 180 mg per deciliter (3.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Typically, closed-loop control (CLC) studies excluded patients with significant hypoglycemia. We evaluated the effectiveness of hybrid CLC (HCLC) versus sensor-augmented pump (SAP) in reducing hypoglycemia in this high-risk population. Forty-four subjects with type 1 diabetes, 25 women, 37 ± 2 years old, HbA1c 7.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Use of artificial pancreas (AP) requires seamless interaction of device components, such as continuous glucose monitor (CGM), insulin pump, and control algorithm. Mobile AP configurations also include a smartphone as computational hub and gateway to cloud applications (e.g.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Glucose variability (GV) remains a key limiting factor in the success of diabetes management. While new technologies, for example, accurate continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) and connected insulin delivery devices, are now available, current treatment standards fail to leverage the wealth of information generated. Expert systems, from automated insulin delivery to advisory systems, are a key missing element to richer, more personalized, glucose management in diabetes.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aims: In type 1 diabetes (T1D), repeated hypoglycemic episodes may reduce hormonal defenses and increase the risk for severe hypoglycemia. In this work, we investigate the effect of a structured hyper/hypoglycemic metabolic challenge on the postintervention glucose variability in T1D subjects studied at home.

Methods: Thirty T1D subjects using insulin pump were monitored with blood glucose meters (SMBG) during a 1-month observation period.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • A clinical trial was conducted to evaluate a closed-loop control (CLC) system for managing type 1 diabetes (T1D), wherein the goal is to maintain near-normal blood sugar levels overnight.
  • Results showed that participants using CLC spent significantly more time within the target glucose range (70-180 mg/dL) and had less time in the hypoglycemic range compared to those using traditional sensor-augmented pump therapy (SAP).
  • A follow-up study at home also indicated similar positive trends in glycemic control with CLC, suggesting its potential for personalized diabetes management.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Predictions based on continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) data are the basis for automatic suspension and resumption of insulin delivery by a predictive low-glucose management feature termed "suspend before low," which is part of the Medtronic MiniMed 640G combined insulin pump and CGM system. This study assessed the safety and performance characteristics of the system in an in-clinic setting at eight sites.

Materials And Methods: In-clinic standardized increases in basal insulin delivery rates were used to induce nocturnal hypoglycemia in subjects (14-75 years) with type 1 diabetes wearing the MiniMed 640G system.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The safety and effectiveness of the in-home use of a hybrid closed-loop (HCL) system that automatically increases, decreases, and suspends insulin delivery in response to continuous glucose monitoring were investigated.

Methods: Adolescents (n = 30, ages 14-21 years) and adults (n = 94, ages 22-75 years) with type 1 diabetes participated in a multicenter (nine sites in the United States, one site in Israel) pivotal trial. The Medtronic MiniMed 670G system was used during a 2-week run-in phase without HCL control, or Auto Mode, enabled (Manual Mode) and, thereafter, with Auto Mode enabled during a 3-month study phase.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: In the past few years, the artificial pancreas-the commonly accepted term for closed-loop control (CLC) of blood glucose in diabetes-has become a hot topic in research and technology development. In the summer of 2014, we initiated a 6-month trial evaluating the safety of 24/7 CLC during free-living conditions.

Research Design And Methods: Following an initial 1-month Phase 1, 14 individuals (10 males/4 females) with type 1 diabetes at three clinical centers in the United States and one in Italy continued with a 5-month Phase 2, which included 24/7 CLC using the wireless portable Diabetes Assistant (DiAs) developed at the University of Virginia Center for Diabetes Technology.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of a portable, wearable, wireless artificial pancreas system (the Diabetes Assistant [DiAs] running the Unified Safety System) on glucose control at home in overnight-only and 24/7 closed-loop control (CLC) modes in patients with type 1 diabetes.

Research Design And Methods: At six clinical centers in four countries, 30 participants 18-66 years old with type 1 diabetes (43% female, 96% non-Hispanic white, median type 1 diabetes duration 19 years, median A1C 7.3%) completed the study.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • A new closed-loop control (CLC) system for managing glucose levels in type 1 diabetes was tested to "reset" patients' glucose levels to near-normal each morning over multiple nights.
  • In a study involving 10 insulin pump users, CLC significantly increased the time spent in the target glucose range compared to standard therapy, while also lowering morning glucose levels.
  • The findings suggest that using CLC over several nights can improve both overnight and daytime glucose control for people with type 1 diabetes.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The Control to Range Study was a multinational artificial pancreas study designed to assess the time spent in the hypo- and hyperglycemic ranges in adults and adolescents with type 1 diabetes while under closed-loop control. The controller attempted to keep the glucose ranges between 70 and 180 mg/dL. A set of prespecified metrics was used to measure safety.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study aimed to assess how closed-loop control (CLC) affects hypoglycemia risk compared to open-loop (OL) insulin pump therapy in patients with type 1 diabetes.
  • Conducted with 20 participants over two 40-hour sessions, the results indicated that CLC significantly reduced the incidence of hypoglycemia compared to OL, showing a twofold reduction in episodes requiring treatment.
  • However, this hypoglycemia reduction came with a slight increase in average blood glucose levels, suggesting that the safety measures for preventing low blood sugar may have slightly compromised overall glycemic control.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The Hypoglycemia-Hyperglycemia Minimizer (HHM) System aims to mitigate glucose excursions by preemptively modulating insulin delivery based on continuous glucose monitor (CGM) measurements. The "aggressiveness factor" is a key parameter in the HHM System algorithm, affecting how readily the system adjusts insulin infusion in response to changing CGM levels. Twenty adults with type 1 diabetes were studied in closed-loop in a clinical research center for approximately 26 hours.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: We present a clinical trial establishing the feasibility of a control-to-range (CTR) closed-loop system informed by heart rate (HR) and assess the effect of HR information added to CTR on the risk for hypoglycemia during and after exercise.

Subjects And Methods: Twelve subjects with type 1 diabetes (five men, seven women; weight, 68.9 ± 3.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: To evaluate the feasibility of a wearable artificial pancreas system, the Diabetes Assistant (DiAs), which uses a smart phone as a closed-loop control platform.

Research Design And Methods: Twenty patients with type 1 diabetes were enrolled at the Universities of Padova, Montpellier, and Virginia and at Sansum Diabetes Research Institute. Each trial continued for 42 h.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Glucagon counterregulation (GCR) protects against hypoglycemia, but is impaired in type 1 diabetes (T1DM). A model-based analysis of in vivo animal data predicts that the GCR defects are linked to basal hyperglucagonemia. To test this hypothesis we studied the relationship between basal glucagon (BasG) and the GCR response to hypoglycemia in 29 hyperinsulinemic clamps in T1DM patients.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: the widely held assumptions that in type 1 diabetes glucose variability may correlate with insulin sensitivity and impaired epinephrine counterregulation have not been studied directly. Here we investigate possible relationships between outpatient measures of glucose variability and risk for hypoglycemia with physiological characteristics: insulin sensitivity and hypoglycemia counterregulation.

Methods: thirty-four subjects with type 1 diabetes (14 women, 20 men; 37 ± 2.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Recent research suggests that the frequency of driving mishaps is increased in people with Type 1 diabetes (T1DM) as compared to those with Type 2 diabetes or their non-diabetic spouses. This study involved a sample of T1DM drivers and was designed to investigate the metabolic and physiologic demands of driving compared to sitting passively. Participants (N=38) were divided into two groups: the -History group included those reporting no driving mishaps in the past two years, and the +History group included participants reporting at least two such mishaps in the past two years.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF