What does it mean to say that something is a 'priority'? Priority setting is used to balance competing claims for resources, but the nature of the exercise is ambiguous. The priorities which are claimed might be for time, resources, process, rights or service. The setting of priorities might refer to importance, relative value, precedence, special status or lexical ordering.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFThe Tayside Profile for Dementia Planning is an instrument designed to obtain data for population needs assessment and planning. It provides a brief tool to collect a minimum dataset by non-specialists. Third-party informants-informal carers or involved professionals-are used as data sources.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInt J Geriatr Psychiatry
June 1997
A census of all relevant services in an area can be used to identify people with mental impairment suggestive of dementia. Two censuses in Tayside, Scotland, were used to test the effectiveness of this method. False positives accounted for 12% of returns.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFThis paper is based on the results of a postal enquiry to health care professionals working in the care of elderly people in a Scottish Health Board. Responses fall into three main categories. The first refers to issues of process, where lack of information or delays in response create problems.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFScott Med J
December 1994
A postal enquiry to professionals involved in service delivery points to a number of problems in the process of referring elderly people appropriately. These problems related to lack of choice and constrained options, rather than mis-referral through inadequate assessment.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFThe results of a census of all dementia sufferers known to institutional and community services in Angus are reported. A total of 859 sufferers were identified compared with an expected 1013 based on EURODEM prevalence rates. After allowing for cross-boundary flow to institutions, it was estimated that the true identification rate was 80% (809/1013).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFThe present study examined the cheating behavior in competitive and noncompetitive situations of 40 college students classified as Type A (16 women, 24 men) and 40 as Type B (19 women, 21 men). Type A-scoring students were more likely to cheat than Type B-scoring students irrespective of competition. The results suggest that in some situations, especially where expectations for success cannot be met, Type A-scoring students may cheat to achieve success.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF