Background: Sublingual allergy immunotherapy tablets (SLIT-tablets) provide a well-tolerated and clinically efficacious treatment for allergic disease such as allergic rhinitis and allergic asthma. In SLIT, uptake of allergen by immune-competent cells in the oral mucosa activates the immune system and leads to tolerance toward the sensitizing allergen. The ability to deliver the full allergen content into solution within the recommended sublingual holding time is therefore an essential quality of SLIT-tablets that must be supported by the tablet formulation for all relevant allergen sources.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAllergic rhinitis (AR) with or without conjunctivitis (AR/C) is associated with a significant health and economic burden, and is often accompanied by asthma. Pharmacotherapies are the mainstay treatment options for AR and asthma, but guidelines also recommend allergy immunotherapy (AIT). Unlike pharmacotherapies, AIT has the ability to modify the underlying immunologic mechanisms of AR and asthma with the potential for long-term benefits after treatment is discontinued.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: Allergy immunotherapy is a treatment option for allergic rhinoconjunctivitis (ARC). It is unique compared with pharmacotherapy in that it modifies the immunologic pathways that elicit an allergic response. The SQ Timothy grass sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) tablet is approved in North America and throughout Europe for the treatment of adults and children (≥5 years old) with grass pollen-induced ARC.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Allergy Clin Immunol Pract
December 2015
Background: Subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) and sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) have been shown to effectively treat grass pollen allergies, although direct comparisons are sparse.
Objective: To estimate the relative efficacy of SLIT tablets compared with SCIT and SLIT drops in commercially available products though network meta-analysis.
Methods: A literature search of MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library publications.
Clin Drug Investig
December 2006
NovoPen, the first insulin pen injector, was introduced in 1985. This article reviews the published evidence over two decades of use of the NovoPen family of injection devices in diabetes management. A search for NovoPen publications from 1985 onwards was conducted in the following databases: MEDLINE/PubMed, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, American College of Physicians Journal Club, Database of Abstract Reviews and Effects, and Cochrane Controlled Trials Register.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFObjective: To evaluate the precision, accuracy, and durability of an insulin pen injection device (NovoPen 3) at three preset doses (2 IU, 35 IU, and 70 IU) after exposure to various stress and durability tests that were intended to simulate daily use by patients.
Methods: Twenty-nine reusable NovoPen 3 insulin delivery devices were tested. The precision and accuracy of 10 insulin pen devices were evaluated after they were subjected to multiple thermal and vibration stress tests.