Publications by authors named "Shwartz M"

The Veterans Health Administration (VA) increasingly purchases community-based care (CC) to improve healthcare access, including behavioral health. In 2018, VA introduced standardized episodes of care (SEOCs) to guide authorization and purchase of CC services for specific indications in a defined timeframe without bundling payment. In this retrospective cross-sectional study, we describe trends in VA and CC behavioral healthcare utilization using the VA Outpatient Psychiatry SEOC definition.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • - The study investigates how well statistical methods are used in research examining racial and ethnic disparities in surgical care from 2021 to 2022, focusing on if they adequately adjust for variables that could influence outcomes.
  • - Out of 224 papers reviewed, a significant portion (63.2% of single-institution and 60.8% of multisite studies) adjusted for social determinants of health, though only a small fraction considered the clustering of patients within hospitals or the effects of different providers.
  • - The findings indicate that many studies fail to meet essential statistical criteria, suggesting that improving publication guidelines could enhance the accuracy of these studies' estimates of disparities in surgical access and outcomes.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Importance: The 2018 Veterans Affairs Maintaining Internal Systems and Strengthening Integrated Outside Networks (VA MISSION) Act was implemented to increase timely access to care by expanding veterans' opportunities to receive Veterans Affairs (VA)-purchased care in the community (community care [CC]). Because health equity is a major VA priority, it is important to know whether Black and Hispanic veterans compared with White veterans experienced equitable access to primary care within the VA MISSION Act.

Objective: To examine whether utilization of and wait times for primary care differed between Black and Hispanic veterans compared with White veterans in rural and urban areas after the implementation of the VA MISSION Act.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: To evaluate nationwide implementation of a Guidebook designed to standardize safety practices across VA-delivered and VA-purchased care (i.e., Community Care) and identify lessons learned and strategies to improve them.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Increasing community care (CC) use by veterans has introduced new challenges in providing integrated care across the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) and CC. VHA's well-recognized patient safety program has been particularly challenging for CC staff to adopt and implement. To standardize VHA safety practices across both settings, VHA implemented the Patient Safety Guidebook in 2018.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Identifying whether differences in health care disparities are due to within-facility or between-facility differences is key to disparity reductions. The Kitagawa decomposition divides the difference between 2 means into within-facility differences and between-facility differences that are measured on the same scale as the original disparity. It also enables the identification of facilities that contribute most to within-facility differences (based on facility-level disparities and the proportion of patient population served) and between-facility differences.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Importance: Prior studies indicate that Black and Hispanic vs White veterans wait longer for care. However, these studies do not capture the COVID-19 pandemic, which caused care access disruptions, nor implementation of the US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Maintaining Internal Systems and Strengthening Integrated Outside Networks Act (MISSION), which is intended to improve care access by increasing veterans' options to use community clinicians.

Objective: To determine whether wait times increased differentially for Black and Hispanic compared with White veterans from the pre-COVID-19 to COVID-19 periods given concurrent MISSION implementation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Importance: Recent legislation expanded veterans' access to Veterans Health Administration (VA)-purchased care. Quality should be considered when choosing where to get total knee arthroplasty (TKA), but currently available quality metrics provide little guidance.

Objective: To determine whether an association exists between the proportion of TKAs performed (vs purchased) at each VA facility and the quality of care provided (as measured by short-term complication rates).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Federal legislation has increased Veterans Health Administration (VHA) enrollees' access to community care, prompting a study on differences in behavioral health care provided by the VHA versus community sources and the factors affecting those differences.* -
  • The study analyzed data from over 200,000 VHA enrollees, revealing that 20% of inpatient stays were through community care, and most outpatient visits were still handled by VHA, with community care growing but involving less experienced clinicians.* -
  • The findings emphasize the need for better coordination between VHA and community care providers to ensure veterans receive quality inpatient follow-up and outpatient services, leveraging VHA’s expertise in behavioral health.*
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: There are growing concerns that Veterans' increased use of Veterans Health Administration (VA)-purchased care in the community may lead to lower quality of care.

Objective: We compared rates of hospital readmissions following elective total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) that were either performed in VA or purchased by VA through community care (CC) at both the national and facility levels.

Methods: Three-year cohort study using VA and CC administrative data from the VA's Corporate Data Warehouse (October 1, 2016-September 30, 2019).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The 2014 Veterans Choice Act significantly increased funding, allowing veterans greater access to community care at the Veterans Affairs (VA).
  • A study compared costs associated with VA-delivered care vs. VA-purchased care for common surgeries like total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) and cataract surgeries during fiscal year 2018.
  • Findings showed that VA-delivered care was more expensive than purchased care, partly due to laws limiting community provider payments, and higher risk scores in VA patients suggested community providers may avoid high-risk cases.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) both delivers health care in its own facilities and, increasingly, purchases care for veterans in the community. Policy makers, administrators, health care providers, and veterans frequently face decisions about which services should be delivered versus purchased by the VA. Comparisons of quality across settings are essential if veterans are to receive care that is consistently accessible, patient centered, effective, and safe.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment has experienced a rapid transformation in the USA. New direct-acting antiviral (DAA) medications make treatment easier, less toxic, and more successful (90% or greater viral cure) than prior, interferon-based HCV medications. We sought to determine whether DAAs may have improved access to HCV treatment for hard-to-reach populations such as the homeless.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The Veterans Choice Act of 2014 increased the number of Veterans eligible for Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)-purchased care delivered in non-VA community care (CC) facilities. Driving >40 miles from home to a VA facility is a key eligibility criterion for CC. It remains unclear whether this policy change improved geographical access by reducing drive distance for Veterans.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The 2014 Veterans Access, Choice and Accountability Act was intended to improve Veterans' access to timely health care by expanding their options to receive community care (CC) paid for by the Veterans Health Administration (VA). Although CC could particularly benefit rural Veterans, we know little about rural Veterans' experiences with CC.

Objective: The objective of this study was to compare rural Veterans' experiences with CC and VA outpatient health care services to those of urban Veterans and examine changes over time.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The 2014 Veterans Choice Program aimed to improve care access for Veterans through expanded availability of community care (CC). Increased access to CC could particularly benefit rural Veterans, who often face obstacles in obtaining medical care at the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). However, whether Veterans Choice Program improved timely access to care for this vulnerable population is understudied.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Timely access to outpatient care was a primary driver behind the Department of Veterans Affairs' (VA's) increased purchase of community-based care under the Veterans Access, Choice, and Accountability Act of 2014, known as the Choice Act. To compare veterans' experiences in VA-delivered and community-based outpatient care after implementation of the act, we assessed veterans' scores on four dimensions of experience-access, communication, coordination, and provider rating-for outpatient specialty, primary, and mental health care received during 2016-17. Patient experiences were better for VA than for community care in all respects except access.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study aimed to compare 90-day postoperative complication rates of cataract surgery between Veterans treated in the VA system and those receiving care through Community Care during the first year of the Veterans Choice Act.
  • Data was sourced from FY 2015 VA and CC outpatient records, using a retrospective approach to analyze complications based on established medical criteria while considering patients' backgrounds and health conditions.
  • Results showed that, despite 31% of surgeries happening in Community Care, complication rates were low overall and did not significantly differ between the two groups after adjusting for various factors.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Hospitals face ongoing pressure to reduce patient safety events. However, given resource constraints, hospitals must prioritize their safety improvements. There is limited literature on how hospitals select their safety priorities.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The few studies that have examined the relationship between midlife cardiovascular disease risk and longer-term costs have differentiated risk using a small number of risk categories. In this paper, we illustrate the advantages of a continuous-valued score to examine the relationship between risk and longer-term costs: the Framingham 10-year coronary heart disease risk score.

Methods: Our study cohort consisted of 1333 Second Generation Framingham Heart Study participants enrolled in fee-for-service Medicare for at least 8 quarters and who had a risk score assessment between age 40 and 50 years.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) complexes mediate higher order chromosome structures. Eukaryotic cells contain three distinct SMC complexes called cohesin, condensin, and SMC5/6, which share the same basic architecture. The core of SMC complexes contains a heterodimer of SMC proteins, a kleisin subunit, and a set of regulatory proteins that contain HEAT and Armadillo (ARM) repeat protein-protein interaction motifs.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: To overcome the limitations of administrative data in adequately adjusting for differences in patients' risk of readmissions, recent studies have added supplemental data from patient surveys and other sources (e.g., electronic health records).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

We constructed a novel measure of homelessness to examine differences in hepatitis C virus (HCV) prevalence across 3 categories of unstably housed and homeless veterans and across US Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center facilities. We used Veterans Affairs administrative data to classify a cohort of 434 240 veterans as at risk of homelessness, currently homeless, or formerly homeless, and we examined variation in HCV prevalence by using descriptive measures and mixed-effect logistic regression models. HCV prevalence was highest among veterans who were formerly homeless (16.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: To assess differences in risk (measured by expected costs associated with sociodemographic and clinical profiles) between Veterans receiving outpatient services through two community care (CC) programs: the Fee program ("Fee") and the Veterans Choice Program ("Choice").

Data Sources/study Setting: Administrative data from VHA's Corporate Data Warehouse in fiscal years (FY) 2014-2015.

Study Design: We compared the clinical characteristics of Veterans across three groups (Fee only, Choice only, and Fee & Choice).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF