Publications by authors named "Shulamit Kahn"

Article Synopsis
  • Researchers looked at studies from 2000 to 2020 about gender bias in academic science, trying to see if women really face discrimination.
  • They found that women do just as well as men in getting grants, having their work accepted in journals, and getting recommendation letters; in fact, women have an advantage when it comes to hiring!
  • However, they still saw some bias in teaching ratings and salaries, meaning women might not be treated fairly in those areas, even though it wasn't as bad as many people think; they also noted that bigger social issues might still be holding women back.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: To analyze the relationship between gender, race/ethnicity, and the probability of being awarded an R01 grant from the National Institutes of Health (NIH).

Method: The authors used data from the NIH Information for Management, Planning, Analysis, and Coordination grants management database for the years 2000-2006 to examine gender differences and race/ethnicity-specific gender differences in the probability of receiving an R01 Type 1 award. The authors used descriptive statistics and probit models to determine the relationship between gender, race/ethnicity, degree, investigator experience, and R01 award probability, controlling for a large set of observable characteristics.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Women are an increasing percentage of Bachelors in Engineering (BSEs) graduates-rising from 1% in 1970 to 20% in the 2000s-encouraged by increasing K-12 emphasis on attracting girls to STEM and efforts to incorporate engineering and technology into K-12 curricula. Retention of women in STEM and in engineering in particular has been a concern historically. In this paper, we investigate whether this gap has increased because a larger proportion of females entering engineering find themselves ill-matched to this field, or whether the gap has decreased as engineering becomes more accommodating to women.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Leslie et al. (Reports, 16 January 2015, p. 262) concluded that "expectations of brilliance" explained the gender makeup of academic disciplines.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Much has been written in the past two decades about women in academic science careers, but this literature is contradictory. Many analyses have revealed a level playing field, with men and women faring equally, whereas other analyses have suggested numerous areas in which the playing field is not level. The only widely-agreed-upon conclusion is that women are underrepresented in college majors, graduate school programs, and the professoriate in those fields that are the most mathematically intensive, such as geoscience, engineering, economics, mathematics/computer science, and the physical sciences.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF