Using Bundled Interventions to Reduce Surgical Site Infection After Major Gynecologic Cancer Surgery.

Objective: To investigate whether implementing a bundle, defined as a set of evidence-based practices performed collectively, can reduce 30-day surgical site infections.

Methods: Baseline surgical site infection rates were determined retrospectively for cases of open uterine cancer, ovarian cancer without bowel resection, and ovarian cancer with bowel resection between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2012, at an academic center. A perioperative bundle was prospectively implemented during the intervention period (August 1, 2013, to September 30, 2014).

Balancing venous thromboembolism and hematoma after breast surgery.

Purpose: The purposes of this study are (1) to determine our institution's rate of venous thromboembolic events (VTE) and hematomas following breast surgery, and (2) to compare our breast surgery VTE rate with both our general surgery population and the National surgical quality improvement program (NSQIP) dataset.

Methods: Prospectively collected NSQIP data from April 2006 to June 2010 were analyzed. Our institution's VTE rates, pharmacologic prophylaxis (PCP) utilization, and hematomas were reviewed for patients undergoing breast surgery.

How best to measure surgical quality? Comparison of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Patient Safety Indicators (AHRQ-PSI) and the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) postoperative adverse events at a single institution.

Background: Evaluating surgical outcomes is an important tool to compare providers and institutions and to drive process improvements. Differing methodologies, however, may provide conflicting measurements of similar clinical outcomes making comparisons difficult. ACS-NSQIP is a validated, risk-adjusted, clinically derived data methodology to compare observed to expected outcomes after a wide variety of operations.