Objectives: To build a data set capturing the whole breast cancer screening journey from individual breast cancer screening records to outcomes and assess data quality.
Methods: Routine screening records (invitation, attendance, test results) from all 79 English NHS breast screening centres between January 1, 1988 and March 31, 2018 were linked to cancer registry (cancer characteristics and treatment) and national mortality data. Data quality was assessed using comparability, validity, timeliness, and completeness.
Objectives: Minimum caseload standards for professionals examining breast screening mammograms vary from 480 (US) to 5000 (Europe). We measured the relationship between the number of women's mammograms examined per year and reader performance.
Methods: We extracted routine records from the English NHS Breast Screening Programme for readers examining between 1000 and 45,000 mammograms between April 2014 and March 2017.
Background: The Sloane audit compares screen-detected ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) pathology with subsequent management and outcomes.
Methods: This was a national, prospective cohort study of DCIS diagnosed during 2003-2012.
Results: Among 11,337 patients, 7204 (64%) had high-grade DCIS.
Objective: To evaluate the long term risks of invasive breast cancer and death from breast cancer after ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) diagnosed through breast screening.
Design: Population based observational cohort study.
Setting: Data from the NHS Breast Screening Programme and the National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service.
Background: Management of screen-detected ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) remains controversial.
Methods: A prospective cohort of patients with DCIS diagnosed through the UK National Health Service Breast Screening Programme (1st April 2003 to 31st March 2012) was linked to national databases and case note review to analyse patterns of care, recurrence and mortality.
Results: Screen-detected DCIS in 9938 women, with mean age of 60 years (range 46-87), was treated by mastectomy (2931) or breast conserving surgery (BCS) (7007; 70%).
J Low Genit Tract Dis
January 2016
Objective: The aim of the study was to investigate the impact of country of birth on the pattern of disease and survival from cervical cancer in women living in the United Kingdom.
Materials And Methods: A retrospective database evaluation study was performed to review all cases of cervical cancer diagnosed in the Pan-Birmingham Cancer Network between 2005 and 2009. Population characteristics and survival data were obtained from the West Midlands Cancer Registry and National Health Authority Information System, United Kingdom.
Despite surgical removal of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), recurrences still occur. This retrospective cohort study evaluated the risk of invasive recurrence following surgery and investigated factors which may be predictive of recurrence. We specifically investigated invasive recurrence with respect to mode of detection of DCIS.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFObjectives: To determine whether surgeon case volume and Unit case volume affected specific recognized key performance indicators (KPIs) of breast cancer surgical management.
Background: An increasing body of evidence suggests that a higher standard of cancer care, demonstrated by improved outcomes, is provided in high-volume units or by high-volume surgeons. The volume-outcome relationship pertaining to screen-detected breast cancers has yet to be thoroughly established and remains a pertinent issue in view of the debate surrounding breast cancer screening.
Oncologists recommend chemotherapy to postmenopausal women with adverse prognostic factors, but predictors of the benefit of chemotherapy are mainly based on mortality from symptomatic cancer trials. From 1990 to 1998, 1475 breast cancers (875 screen detected cancers [SDBCs]: 600 symptomatic) were treated in women aged 50-65 years and prognostic factors compared with cancer mortality. Median follow-up was 110 months.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF