Publications by authors named "Shahiri T"

Objectives: Pain assessment in the intensive care unit (ICU) is challenging because many patients are unable to self-report or exhibit pain-related behaviors. In such situations, vital signs (VS) through continuous monitoring are alternative cues for pain assessment. This review aimed to describe the reliability and validity of VS for ICU pain assessment.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: The aim of this study was to explore the use of a multi-parameter technology, the Nociception Level (NOL) index (Medasense Biometrics Ltd, Ramat Gan, Israel), for pain assessment in postoperative awake patients after cardiac surgery during non-nociceptive and nociceptive procedures in the intensive care unit (ICU).

Materials And Methods: A prospective cohort repeated-measures design was used. Patients were included if they were in the ICU after undergoing cardiac surgery and if they could self-report their pain.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Maintaining optimum analgesia in anesthetized patients is challenging due to the inability to self-report pain or exhibit pain-related behaviours. The Analgesia Nociception Index (ANI) (based on heart rate variability [HRV]) and the Nociception Level Index (NOL) (based on HRV, photoplethysmography, skin conductance, and temperature) both include HRV and provide continuous index monitoring for nociception assessment. The research question was: "What are the validation strategies of the NOL and ANI for nociception assessment in anesthetized patients?".

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Many patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) suffer from pain and are non-communicative. Therefore, alternative pain measures are necessary. Although behavioral pain measures are available, physiological measures are lacking.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • - The review analyzed 106 articles to evaluate the effectiveness of behavioral pain assessment tools for critically ill adults who cannot communicate, focusing on their scale development, reliability, and clinical use.
  • - Nine specific tools for noncommunicative critically ill adults and four for other groups were compared using a scoring system to assess their quality.
  • - The top-rated tools, such as the Behavioral Pain Scale and Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool, have shown strong psychometric properties and validation across different countries and languages, though more research is needed on other alternatives.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF