Implementation and evaluation of a national quality improvement initiative in cancer surgery.

Background: In 2017, the Canadian Partnership Against Cancer, a Canadian federally sponsored organisation, initiated a national multijurisdictional quality improvement (QI) initiative to maximise the use of synoptic data to drive cancer system improvements, known as the Evidence for Surgical Synoptic Quality Improvement Programme. The goal of our study was to evaluate the outcomes, determinants and learning of this nationally led initiative across six jurisdictions in Canada, integrating a mix of cancer surgery disease sites and clinicians.

Methods: A mixed-methods evaluation (surveys, semistructured interviews and focus groups) of this initiative was focused on the ability of each jurisdiction to use synoptic reporting data to successfully implement and sustain QI projects to beyond the completion of the initiative and the lessons learnt in the process.

Accountability and primary healthcare.

This paper examines the accountability structures within primary healthcare (PHC) in Ontario; in particular, who is accountable for what and to whom, and the policy tools being used. Ontario has implemented a series of incremental reforms, using expenditure policy instruments, enforced through contractual agreements to provide a defined set of publicly financed services that are privately delivered, most often by family physicians. The findings indicate that reporting, funding, evaluation and governance accountability requirements vary across service provider models.

Data that makes a difference in quality improvements in primary health care: approaches through a pan-Canadian voluntary electronic medical record source.

Primary Health Care (PHC) is the most common health care experienced by Canadians and is an important source of chronic disease prevention and management; however, PHC providers say they have little information about their patient populations, especially groups of patients with multiple conditions. The Canadian Institute for Health Information in collaboration with 50 PHC providers examined the ability to extract and use a subset of PHC EMR data from four disparate environments in an agreed and privacy sensitive manner. Findings describing the feasibility of clinician engagement, EMR data extraction, EMR content standards and data utility gaps, information system requirements, and systemic enablers and barriers are described in this paper.

Development of electronic medical record content standards to collect pan-Canadian Primary Health Care indicator data.

In 2006 the Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI) released a set of 105 pan-Canadian Primary Health Care (PHC) indicators. This was followed by an assessment of data gaps, which prevented the calculation of the indicators, and the data collection options available to close the gaps. A quality review of Electronic Medical Record (EMR) data indicated a requirement for content standards.

Role of obesity on the risk for total hip or knee arthroplasty.

We asked whether there was an association between obesity levels and subsequent THA or TKA using data from 54,406 THA and TKA patients entered into the Canadian Joint Replacement Registry. We compared these patients with a sample of the Canadian population using the Canadian Community Health Survey of 2006. We analyzed information from the Canadian Joint Replacement Registry to quantify the relative risk for THA or TKA in Canada for specific body mass index categories.