Enhanced evolution by stochastically variable modification of epigenetic marks in the early embryo.

Evolution by gene duplication is generally accepted as one of the crucial driving forces for the gain of new complexity and functions, but the formation of pseudogenes remains a problem for this mechanism. Here we expand on earlier ideas that epigenetic modifications can drive neo- and subfunctionalization in evolution by gene duplication. We explore the effects of stochastic epigenetic modifications on the evolution (and thus development) of complex organisms in a constant environment.

On origin of genetic code and tRNA before translation.

Background: Synthesis of proteins is based on the genetic code - a nearly universal assignment of codons to amino acids (aas). A major challenge to the understanding of the origins of this assignment is the archetypal "key-lock vs. frozen accident" dilemma.

CpG island clusters and pro-epigenetic selection for CpGs in protein-coding exons of HOX and other transcription factors.

CpG dinucleotides contribute to epigenetic mechanisms by being the only site for DNA methylation in mammalian somatic cells. They are also mutation hotspots and approximately 5-fold depleted genome-wide. We report here a study focused on CpG sites in the coding regions of Hox and other transcription factor genes, comparing methylated genomes of Homo sapiens, Mus musculus, and Danio rerio with nonmethylated genomes of Drosophila melanogaster and Caenorhabditis elegans.

On primordial sense-antisense coding.

The genetic code is implemented by aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRS). These 20 enzymes are divided into two classes that, despite performing same functions, have nothing common in structure. The mystery of this striking partition of aaRSs might have been concealed in their sterically complementary modes of tRNA recognition that, as we have found recently, protect the tRNAs with complementary anticodons from confusion in translation.

One ancestor for two codes viewed from the perspective of two complementary modes of tRNA aminoacylation.

Background: The genetic code is brought into action by 20 aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases. These enzymes are evenly divided into two classes (I and II) that recognize tRNAs from the minor and major groove sides of the acceptor stem, respectively. We have reported recently that: (1) ribozymic precursors of the synthetases seem to have used the same two sterically mirror modes of tRNA recognition, (2) having these two modes might have helped in preventing erroneous aminoacylation of ancestral tRNAs with complementary anticodons, yet (3) the risk of confusion for the presumably earliest pairs of complementarily encoded amino acids had little to do with anticodons.

Translation of both complementary strands might govern early evolution of the genetic code.

The updated structural and phylogenetic analyses of tRNA pairs with complementary anticodons provide independent support for our earlier finding, namely that these tRNA pairs concertedly show complementary second bases in the acceptor stem. Two implications immediately follow: first, that a tRNA molecule gained its present, complete, cloverleaf shape via duplication(s) of a shorter precursor. Second, that common ancestry is shared by two major components of the genetic code within the tRNA molecule--the classic code per se embodied in anticodon triplets, and the operational code of aminoacylation embodied primarily in the first three base pairs of the acceptor stems.

Partitioning of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases in two classes could have been encoded in a strand-symmetric RNA world.

The "chicken-or-egg" dilemma dictates that archaic tRNAs be aminoacylated by ribozymic aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases, rAARSs, with protein synthetases (pAARSs) emerging later and, strikingly in two versions. However, the distribution of these two versions among the codons also suggests their involvement in development of the genetic code. Here we propose a solution to this controversy, which relies on a primordial complementarity hypothesis that in a strand-symmetric RNA world both complementary replicas of many genes could encode the first proteins.

Origin of the genetic code: first aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases could replace isofunctional ribozymes when only the second base of codons was established.

Analysis of the updated compilation of more than 8,000 tRNA gene sequences confirmed our previously reported finding that in pairs of consensus tRNAs with complementary anticodons, their second bases in the acceptor stems are also complementary. This dual complementarity points to the following: (1) the operational code embodied in the acceptor stem, and the classic genetic code embodied in the anticodon could have had the same common ancestor; (2) new tRNAs most likely entered primitive translation in pairs with complementary anticodons; and (3) this process of code expansion was directed by the primordial double-strand coding. However, we did not find the dual complementarity when testing all tRNA pairs in which anticodons were complementary only at the central position, but not complementary at least at one of the flanking two positions.

Repositioning-dependent fate of duplicate genes.

Gene duplication is the main source of evolutionary novelties. However, the problem with duplicates is that the purifying selection overlooks deleterious mutations in the redundant sequence, which therefore, instead of gaining a new function, often degrades into a functionless pseudogene. This risk of functional loss instead of gain is much higher for small populations of higher organisms with a slow and complex development.

Origins and selection of p53 mutations in lung carcinogenesis.

Molecular epidemiologists usually consider the spectrum of p53 mutations found in human tumors to be a signature of the corresponding environmental carcinogen(s). In lung cancer, this signature is the spectrum of G --> T transversions, presumably induced by polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) from cigarette smoke. What complicates the situation, however, is that in the p53 gene the same codons are preferential targets for not only mutagenesis but also tumorigenic selection.

Position-associated GC asymmetry of gene duplicates.

It is well known that repositioning of a gene often exerts a strong impact on its own expression and whole development. Here we report the results of genome-wide analyses suggesting that repositioning may also radically change the evolutionary fate of gene duplicates. As an indicator of these changes, we used the GC content of gene pairs which originated by duplication.

On the excess of G --> T transversions in the p53 gene in lung cancer cell lines. Reply to Pfeifer and Hainaut.

Our recent retrospective analysis of the lung cancer-associated p53 mutation data [Mutat. Res. 508 (2002) 1] showed the possibility of (i) inhibiting action of tobacco smoke on repair of G --> T primary lesions in the non-transcribed strand of the p53 gene and (ii) the origin of new p53 mutations, predominantly G --> T transversions, in lung cancer cell lines apparently unexposed to tobacco smoke.

Epigenetic silencing may aid evolution by gene duplication.

Gene duplication is commonly regarded as the main evolutionary path toward the gain of a new function. However, even with gene duplication, there is a loss-versus-gain dilemma: most newly born duplicates degrade to pseudogenes, since degenerative mutations are much more frequent than advantageous ones. Thus, something additional seems to be needed to shift the loss versus gain equilibrium toward functional divergence.

On the origin of p53 G:C --> T:A transversions in lung cancers.

The high frequency of G-->T transversions in the p53 gene is a distinctive feature of lung cancer patients with a smoking history and is commonly believed to reflect the direct mutagenic signature of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) adducts along the gene. Using the April 2000 update of the p53 mutation database of the International Agency for Research on Cancer together with the primary literature, we confirm that the frequency of p53 G-->T transversions in lung cancer of smokers is about three times higher than their frequency in lung cancer of nonsmokers and in most other smoke-unrelated cancers. In contrast, the frequency of C-->A transversions, the DNA-strand mirror counterpart of G-->T transversions, appears to be similar in virtually all human cancers.