Order of amino acid recruitment into the genetic code resolved by last universal common ancestor's protein domains.

The current "consensus" order in which amino acids were added to the genetic code is based on potentially biased criteria, such as the absence of sulfur-containing amino acids from the Urey-Miller experiment which lacked sulfur. More broadly, abiotic abundance might not reflect biotic abundance in the organisms in which the genetic code evolved. Here, we instead identify which protein domains date to the last universal common ancestor (LUCA) and then infer the order of recruitment from deviations of their ancestrally reconstructed amino acid frequencies from the still-ancient post-LUCA controls.

The effectiveness of selection in a species affects the direction of amino acid frequency evolution.

Nearly neutral theory predicts that species with higher effective population size ( ) are better able to purge slightly deleterious mutations. We compare evolution in high- vs. low- vertebrates to reveal which amino acid frequencies are subject to subtle selective preferences.

Order of amino acid recruitment into the genetic code resolved by Last Universal Common Ancestor's protein domains.

The current "consensus" order in which amino acids were added to the genetic code is based on potentially biased criteria, such as absence of sulfur-containing amino acids from the Urey-Miller experiment which lacked sulfur. More broadly, abiotic abundance might not reflect biotic abundance in the organisms in which the genetic code evolved. Here, we instead identify which protein domains date to the last universal common ancestor (LUCA), then infer the order of recruitment from deviations of their ancestrally reconstructed amino acid frequencies from the still-ancient post-LUCA controls.

A comparative analysis of L1 retrotransposition activities in human genomes suggests an ongoing increase in L1 number despite an evolutionary trend towards lower activity.

Background: LINE-1 (Long Interspersed Nuclear Elements, L1) retrotransposons are the only autonomously active transposable elements in the human genome. The evolution of L1 retrotransposition rates and its implications for L1 dynamics are poorly understood. Retrotransposition rates are commonly measured in cell culture-based assays, but it is unclear how well these measurements provide insight into L1 population dynamics.