Pediatr Transplant
February 2018
PDDTE are tracked by the OPTN Ad Hoc DTAC. Specific evaluation of potential transmissions from pediatric deceased donors or the impact of donor-derived disease transmissions to pediatric organ recipients has not been previously undertaken. PDDTE reported to the DTAC between 2008 and 2013 were reviewed, characterized as proven, probable, possible, IWDT, unlikely, or excluded for both the whole event and each individual recipient.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: In 2013, the public health service (PHS) changed the criteria intended to identify organ donors that put the associated organ recipients at increased risk for acquiring human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B virus (HBV), and hepatitis C virus (HCV). The changing donor demographics, organ utilization, and outcomes associated with this change are not known.
Methods: A review of the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network database was performed to assess the impact of PHS donor designation on organ utilization and outcomes.
Background: The Organ Procurement Transplant Network Disease Transmission Advisory Committee (DTAC), a multidisciplinary committee, evaluates potential donor-derived transmission events (PDDTE), including infections and malignancies, to assess for donor transmitted events.
Methods: Reports of unexpected PDDTE to Organ Procurement Transplant Network in 2013 were fully reviewed by DTAC. A standardized algorithm was used to assess each PDDTE from a given donor and to classify each individual recipient from that donor.
Background: While donor-derived infections (DDI) remain uncommon, multiple reports describe DDI with pathogens that cause central nervous system (CNS) infection resulting in significant recipient disease. The Ad Hoc Disease Transmission Advisory Committee (DTAC) reviewed the records of potential donor-derived disease transmission events (PDDTE) to describe donor characteristics and outcomes associated with DDI from CNS pathogens.
Methods: All PDDTE reported from January 2008 to September 2010 were reviewed for characteristics suggesting CNS infection in the donor or the recipient.
Background & Aims: We sought to estimate the risk of perioperative mortality or acute liver failure for live liver donors in the United States and avoid selection or ascertainment biases and sample size limitations.
Methods: We followed up 4111 live liver donors in the United States between April 1994 and March 2011 for a mean of 7.6 years; deaths were determined from the Social Security Death Master File.
Context: More than 6000 healthy US individuals every year undergo nephrectomy for the purposes of live donation; however, safety remains in question because longitudinal outcome studies have occurred at single centers with limited generalizability.
Objectives: To study national trends in live kidney donor selection and outcome, to estimate short-term operative risk in various strata of live donors, and to compare long-term death rates with a matched cohort of nondonors who are as similar to the donor cohort as possible and as free as possible from contraindications to live donation.
Design, Setting, And Participants: Live donors were drawn from a mandated national registry of 80 347 live kidney donors in the United States between April 1, 1994, and March 31, 2009.
During the last 10 to 15 years, medical and surgical innovations have established pediatric liver transplantation as the optimal therapy for children suffering acute and chronic liver disease. We hypothesized that the profile of current pediatric liver transplant recipients would differ significantly from that of an earlier era. We collected and compared data regarding the characteristics of children undergoing liver transplantation alone in 2 eras separated by more than a decade from the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network/United Network for Organ Sharing database.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF1. Additions to the OPTN waiting list decreased in 2002 for all organs except kidney and pancreas islets. 2.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: Pretransplant systemic inflammation has been associated with decreased renal allograft survival, and infectious agents such as cytomegalovirus (CMV) may play a role. We hypothesized that pretransplant CMV seropositivity is a risk factor for decreased patient and allograft survival after cadaveric renal transplantation and that other factors believed to modulate systemic inflammation, such as dialysis modality, might act synergistically with CMV to decrease patient and allograft survival.
Methods: The United Network for Organ Sharing database was reviewed to identify all patients undergoing cadaveric renal transplantation in the United States from 1988 to 1997.
1. On November 30, 2002, there were 86,452 registrations on the combined UNOS waiting list. Of these, 65% were awaiting kidney transplantation and 20% were awaiting liver transplantation.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: Pancreas transplantation improves quality of life and prevents the progression of secondary complications of diabetes. Whether these benefits translate into a long-term survival advantage is not entirely clear.
Methods: Using the United Network for Organ Sharing database, we analyzed long-term survival in 18,549 patients with type 1 diabetes and renal failure who received a kidney transplant between 1987 and 1996.
Background: Our aim was to use the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) database to determine the number of renal waitlist candidates who previously had been living donors.
Methods: All living renal donors in the OPTN database were cross-checked against the renal waitlist history files. Additionally, renal transplant programs were contacted that had listed candidates as qualified for four additional allocation points available to patients who previously had donated an organ.
The predictive power of a positive B-cell crossmatch remains controversial due to the presence of cofactors, such as sensitization and human leukocyte antigen (HLA) mismatch levels. UNOS OPTN/Scientific Registry data were analyzed on 9031 cadaveric kidney graft recipients who were B-cell crossmatched during 1994 and 1995 for graft outcome. This 2-year time period was chosen so that most US transplant recipients in this study would have had a similar regimen of immunosuppression consisting of prednisone, Sandimmune, and azathioprine The two patient groups that were analyzed were B-pos (n = 336) and B-neg (n = 8,695).
View Article and Find Full Text PDF