Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the inter- and intra-rater reliability of consensus auditory-perceptual evaluation of voice (CAPE-V) auditory-perceptual ratings and explore task-specific differences (sustained vowels versus sentences) in ratings and reliability.
Study Design: Cross-sectional reliability study using a curated subset of dysphonic voice samples (PVQD).
Methods: Thirty voice samples representing varying dysphonia severities were selected from the Perceptual Voice Qualities Database.