The combination of covalent and ionic exchange immobilizations enables the coimmobilization on vinyl sulfone activated supports and the reuse of the most stable immobilized enzyme.

The coimmobilization of lipases from Rhizomucor miehei (RML) and Candida antarctica (CALB) has been intended using agarose beads activated with divinyl sulfone. CALB could be immobilized on this support, while RML was not. However, RML was ionically exchanged on this support blocked with ethylendiamine.

Effect of Concentrated Salts Solutions on the Stability of Immobilized Enzymes: Influence of Inactivation Conditions and Immobilization Protocol.

This paper aims to investigate the effects of some salts (NaCl, (NH)SO and NaSO) at pH 5.0, 7.0 and 9.

Enzyme co-immobilization: Always the biocatalyst designers' choice…or not?

The increasing relevance of cascade reactions in biocatalysis has sparked a great interest for enzyme co-immobilization. Enzyme co-immobilization allows access to some kinetic advantages that in some instances are necessary to get the desired product, avoiding side-reactions. However, the kinetic effect is very relevant mainly at the initial reaction rates, while it may be less relevant in the whole reaction course, depending on the kinetic parameters of the involved enzymes.

Use of polyethylenimine to produce immobilized lipase multilayers biocatalysts with very high volumetric activity using octyl-agarose beads: Avoiding enzyme release during multilayer production.

A strategy to obtain biocatalysts formed by three enzyme layers has been designed using lipases A and B from Candida antarctica (CALA and CALB), the lipases from Rhizomucor miehei (RML) and Thermomyces lanuginosus (TLL), and the artificial chimeric phospholipase Lecitase Ultra (LEU). The enzymes were initially immobilized via interfacial activation on octyl-agarose beads, treated with polyethylenimine (PEI) and a new enzyme layer was immobilized on the octyl-enzyme-PEI composite by ion exchange, producing octyl-enzyme-PEI-enzyme biocatalysts. Except when using LEU, when the two-layer biocatalysts, a large percentage of the PEI-immobilized enzyme was released when a new batch of PEI was added.

Effects of Enzyme Loading and Immobilization Conditions on the Catalytic Features of Lipase From Immobilized on Octyl-Agarose Beads.

The lipase from (PFL) has been immobilized on octyl-agarose beads under 16 different conditions (varying pH, ionic strength, buffer, adding some additives) at two different loadings, 1 and 60 mg of enzyme/g of support with the objective of check if this can alter the biocatalyst features. The activity of the biocatalysts versus -nitrophenyl butyrate and triacetin and their thermal stability were studied. The different immobilization conditions produced biocatalysts with very different features.

Modulating the properties of the lipase from Thermomyces lanuginosus immobilized on octyl agarose beads by altering the immobilization conditions.

The lipase from Thermomyces lanuginosus (TLL) has been immobilized on octyl-agarose beads via interfacial activation under 16 different conditions (changing the immobilization pH, the ionic strength, the presence of additives like calcium, phosphate or glycerol) and using a low loading (1 mg/g support). Then, the properties of the different biocatalysts have been evaluated: stability at pH 7.0 and 70 °C and activity versus p-nitro phenyl propionate, triacetin and R- and S- methyl mandelate.

Coimmobilization of different lipases: Simple layer by layer enzyme spatial ordering.

This paper shows the step by step coimmobilization of up to five different enzymes following two different orders in the coimmobilization to alter the effect of substrate diffusion limitations. The enzymes were the lipases A and B from Candida antarctica, the lipases from Rhizomocur miehei and, Themomyces lanuginosus and the phospholipase Lecitase Ultra. The utilized strategy was a layer by layer immobilization, coating the immobilized enzymes with polyethylenimine followed by the crosslinking of the enzyme and PEI with glutaraldehyde to prevent enzyme release, and them adding a new lipase layer.

Immobilization of lipase from Pseudomonas fluorescens on glyoxyl-octyl-agarose beads: Improved stability and reusability.

The lipase from Pseudomonas fluorescens (PFL) has been immobilized on glyoxyl-octyl agarose and compared to the enzyme immobilized on octyl-agarose. Thus, PFL was immobilized at pH 7 on glyoxyl-octyl support via lipase interfacial activation and later incubated at pH 10.5 for 20 h before reduction to get some enzyme-support covalent bonds.

New applications of glyoxyl-octyl agarose in lipases co-immobilization: Strategies to reuse the most stable lipase.

Lipase B from Candida antarctica (CALB), lipase from Rhizomucor miehei (RML) and phospholipase Lecitase Ultra (LEU) were immobilized via interfacial activation and their stabilities were compared. Immobilized CALB was much more stable than immobilized RML or LEU. That meant that, if they were coimmobilized, after the inactivation of the least stable lipases, CALB should be discarded even though it may maintain full activity.

Further Stabilization of Alcalase Immobilized on Glyoxyl Supports: Amination Plus Modification with Glutaraldehyde.

Alcalase was immobilized on glyoxyl 4% CL agarose beads. This permitted to have Alcalase preparations with 50% activity retention versus Boc-l-alanine 4-nitrophenyl ester. However, the recovered activity versus casein was under 20% at 50 °C, as it may be expected from the most likely area of the protein involved in the immobilization.

Immobilization on octyl-agarose beads and some catalytic features of commercial preparations of lipase a from Candida antarctica (Novocor ADL): Comparison with immobilized lipase B from Candida antarctica.

Lipase A from Candida antarctica (CALA, commercialized as Novocor ADL) was immobilized on octyl-agarose, which is a very useful support for lipase immobilization, and coated with polyethylenimine to improve the stability. The performance was compared to that of the form B of the enzyme (CALB) immobilized on the same support, as both enzymes are among the most popular ones used in biocatalysis. CALA immobilization produced a significant increase in enzyme activity vs.