Objective: To evaluate the health status and recovery of women after mid-urethral sling (MUS) revision in response to complications.
Design: Cross-sectional study using a questionnaire sent to women from a registry.
Setting: Twenty-two French surgical centres.
Background: Midurethral slings are the gold standard for treating stress urinary incontinence, but their complications may raise concerns. Complications may differ by the approach used to place them.
Objective: This study aimed to compare serious complications and reoperations for recurrence after midurethral sling procedures when using the retropubic vs the transobturator route for female stress urinary incontinence.
Introduction: Multidisciplinary team meetings (MTMs) in the field of pelvic floor diseases in women tend to generalize, as they are required as mandatory before mid-urethral sling implantation or sacrocolpopexy by recent decrees published by the French health authorities. However, access to these meetings is variable in the French territory. The goal of the present study was to describe the existence and the settings of these kinds of meetings in France.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFTo evaluate the rates of serious complications and reoperation for recurrence following sacrospinous ligament fixation (SSLF) for apical pelvic organ prolapse. This was a national registry ancillary cohort comparative study. The VIGI-MESH registry includes data from 24 French health centers prospectively collected between May 2017 and September 2021.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFObjective: Transvaginal tension-free vaginal tape-obturator (TVT-O) is an effective surgical treatment for stress urinary incontinence in women [1]. A correct preoperative urodynamic study has a role in obtaining the best results. However, some complications still occur during and after this surgical procedure.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Minim Invasive Gynecol
October 2020
Study Objective: To investigate whether mini-instrumentation may be used for hysterectomy (HT) by all surgeons (assistants and seniors) without increasing the operative time or altering surgeon working conditions.
Design: A unicenter, randomized controlled, single blind, parallel, noninferiority trial comparing 2 surgical techniques.
Setting: A tertiary referral center.
Background: Laparoscopic mesh sacropexy (LS) or transvaginal mesh repair (TVM) are surgical techniques used to treat cystoceles. Health authorities have highlighted the need for comparative studies to evaluate the safety of surgeries with meshes.
Objective: To compare the rate of complications, and functional and anatomical outcomes between LS and TVM.