BACKGROUND This study aimed to compare the hemodynamic changes and the occurrence of oropharyngeal complications among patients undergoing tracheal intubation with an ordinary laryngoscope, video laryngoscope, and rigid video laryngoscope under general anesthesia. MATERIAL AND METHODS Patients undergoing elective tracheal intubation under general anesthesia were prospectively enrolled as study subjects. Hemodynamic indicators such as diastolic blood pressure (DBP), systolic blood pressure (SBP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and heart rate (HR), as well as the incidences of oropharyngeal complications, including dental injury, oral mucosal injury, hoarseness, sore throat, and dysphagia, were observed in the patients of 3 groups (group A: ordinary laryngoscope, group B: video laryngoscope, group C: rigid video laryngoscope).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPatients with advanced cancer and metastasis frequently require analgesic treatments to relieve pain and maintain an acceptable quality of life. Continuous analgesic treatment with epidural drug infusion is one interventional approach to provide adequate pain relief. Most epidural analgesia procedures are performed with the catheter inserted in the lower thoracic or lumbar spine areas, which is then advanced in a cephalad direction to reach the level that requires analgesia.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF