This population-based cross-sectional study evaluates the clinical value of electroretinography and visual evoked potentials in childhood brain tumor survivors. A flash electroretinography and a checkerboard reversal pattern visual evoked potential (or alternatively a flash visual evoked potential) were done for 51 survivors (age 3.8-28.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAim: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of a computerized test, the CANTAB paired associate learning (PAL) to that of an established and validated noncomputerized test, the CERAD Wordlist Learning task in differentiating between normal aging, aMCI and AD in a cross-sectional design.
Methods: 58 participants were assessed (19 with mild probable AD, 17 aMCI, 22 healthy controls).
Results: The variables found to best discriminate between the three groups were the CANTAB PAL total errors adjusted (p < 0.