Publications by authors named "Sabine M Oishi"

Background: A welcoming environment may influence patient care experiences, and it may be particularly relevant for underrepresented groups, such as women veterans at Veterans Health Administration (VA) facilities where they represent only 8-10% of patients. Challenges to ensuring a welcoming environment for women veterans may include unwelcome comments from male veterans and staff or volunteers and feeling unsafe inside or outside VA facilities. We assessed associations between reports of gender-related environment of care problems and patient-reported outcomes.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Few studies have focused on determinants of women's ratings of care experiences in primary care. We assessed associations between availability of women's health services and women veterans' ratings of care experiences.

Methods: In a cross-sectional analysis, we linked Fiscal Year (FY) 2017 (October 1, 2016, to September 30, 2017) survey data from 126 Veterans Health Administration (VA) primary care leaders to 4,254 women veterans' ratings of care from VA's Survey of Healthcare Experiences of Patients-Patient Centered Medical Home (FY 2017).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Collaborative care improves depression and anxiety outcomes. In this naturalistic, observational case study, we adapted an evidence-based depression collaborative care protocol for the assessment and treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and sought to demonstrate that the protocol could be implemented in Veterans Affairs (VA) primary care. Based on feedback from a content expert panel, clinical stakeholders, and a pilot study conducted in a postdeployment clinic, the original depression collaborative care protocol was modified to include PTSD assessment and support for PTSD medication adherence, self-management, and engagement in evidence-based PTSD care.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Ethnography has been proposed as a valuable method for understanding how implementation occurs within dynamic healthcare contexts, yet this method can be time-intensive and challenging to operationalize in pragmatic implementation. The current study describes an ethnographically-informed method of guided discussions developed for use by a multi-project national implementation program.

Methods: The EMPOWER QUERI is conducting three projects to implement innovative care models in VA women's health for high-priority health concerns - prediabetes, cardiovascular risk, and mental health - utilizing the Replicating Effective Programs (REP) implementation strategy enhanced with stakeholder engagement and complexity science.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Women veterans are a growing segment of Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) users with distinct mental health needs and well-documented barriers to care. Telemental health holds much promise for reducing barriers to mental health care. We assessed VA stakeholders' perceptions of telemental health's appropriateness and potential to address the mental health needs of women veteran VA users.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The Enhancing Mental and Physical health of Women through Engagement and Retention or EMPOWER program represents a partnership with the US Department of Veterans Health Administration (VA) Health Service Research and Development investigators and the VA Office of Women's Health, National Center for Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Primary Care-Mental Health Integration Program Office, Women's Mental Health Services, and the Office of Patient Centered Care and Cultural Transformation. EMPOWER includes three projects designed to improve women Veterans' engagement and retention in evidence-based care for high-priority health conditions, i.e.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Morbidity related to cancer and its treatment remains a significant source of human suffering and a challenge to the delivery of high-quality care.

Objectives: To develop and apply quality indicators to evaluate quality of supportive care for advanced lung cancer in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) and examine facility-level predictors of quality.

Methods: We evaluated supportive care quality using 12 quality indicators.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: Adoption and implementation of evidence-based genetic and genomic medicine have been slow. We describe a methodology for identifying the influence of organizational factors on adoption and implementation of these services in health-care organizations.

Methods: We illustrate a three-component, mixed-methods health services research approach, including expert panels, qualitative interviews with key informants, and quantitative surveys completed by key informants.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: In a national, integrated health care system, we sought to identify facility-level attributes associated with better quality of lung cancer care.

Methods: Adherence to 23 quality indicators across four domains (Diagnosis and Staging, Treatment, Supportive Care, End-of-Life Care) was assessed through abstraction of electronic records from 4804 lung cancer patients diagnosed in 2007 at 131 Veterans Health Administration facilities. Performance was reported as proportions of eligible patients fulfilling adherence criteria.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: Prior studies report that half of patients with lung cancer do not receive guideline-concordant care. With data from a national Veterans Health Administration (VHA) study on quality of care, we sought to determine what proportion of patients refused or had a contraindication to recommended lung cancer therapy.

Patients And Methods: Through medical record abstraction, we evaluated adherence to six quality indicators addressing lung cancer-directed therapy for patients diagnosed within the VHA during 2007 and calculated the proportion of patients receiving, refusing, or having contraindications to recommended treatment.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: National Veterans Health Administration (VA) organizational data suggested the presence of separate and formal mental health services for female veterans, prompting qualitative exploration of their structure and development.

Methods: Semistructured telephone interviews were conducted with a purposeful sample of 36 VA mental health administrators and providers from 26 VA Medical Centers and large community-based outpatient clinics that reported having separate women's mental health clinics and/or designated women's mental health providers in their outpatient mental health clinics.

Main Findings: VA facilities have implemented a spectrum of women's mental health service delivery arrangements, including specialized mental health providers, co-located mental health providers in women's health clinics, women-only mental health groups, and women's mental health clinics.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: Although the Veterans Health Administration (VA) has recently adopted new policies encouraging gender-specific mental health (MH) care delivery to women veterans, little is known about the potential difficulties local facilities may face in achieving compliance. We assessed variations in women's mental health care delivery arrangements in VA facilities nationwide.

Methods: We used results from the VA Survey of Women Veterans Health Programs, a key informant survey of senior women's health clinicians representing all VA facilities serving more than 300 women veterans, to assess the array of gender-sensitive mental health care arrangements (response rate, 86%; n = 195).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

groups and semi-structured individual interviews with all Depression Clinical Specialists (DCSs) working with Project IMPACT (Improving Mood: Promoting Access to Collaborative Treatment), a study testing a collaborative care intervention for late life depression, to examine integration of the intervention model into primary care. DCSs described key intervention components, including supervision from a psychiatrist and a liaison primary care provider, weekly team meetings, computerized patient tracking, and outcomes assessment tools as effective in supporting patient care. DCSs discussed details of protocols, training, environmental set-up, and interpersonal factors that seemed to facilitate integration.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF